BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32859433)

  • 21. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
    Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China.
    Yuan Z; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Yang J; Zhang Y; Zhou H
    Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1107. PubMed ID: 31737563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
    Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Retrospective comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Cai J; Yang L; Dong W; Wang H; Xiong Z; Wang Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Jan; 132(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 26434669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
    Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Effects of colpotomic approaches on prognosis and recurrence sites of stage Ⅰa2-Ⅱa2 cervical cancer after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy].
    Zhou D; Li YD; Ling KJ; Wang RW; Wang YZ; Tang S; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jan; 58(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 36720615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
    Liu Y; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J
    Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():72-77. PubMed ID: 31220631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
    Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
    Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Discussion on the Treatment Strategy for Stage ⅡA1 Cervical Cancer (FIGO 2018).
    Chen X; Liang W; Duan H; Wu M; Zhan X; Dai E; Lv Q; Xie Q; Liu R; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():800049. PubMed ID: 35494051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Initial treatment for FIGO 2018 stage IIIC cervical cancer based on histological type: A 14-year multicenter study.
    Ye Y; Zhang G; Li Z; Chen B; Zhao H; Yang Y; Wang L; Yao J; Chen X; Huang Y; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Cancer Med; 2023 Oct; 12(19):19617-19632. PubMed ID: 37768092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy and radiochemotherapy IIA2 (FIGO2018) cervical cancer: a retrospective study from a large database of 63,926 cases of cervical cancer in China.
    He J; Li D; Shen P; Liang W; Kang S; Zhang Y; Zhao H; Liu M; Wang X; Lin Z; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2022 Mar; 27(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 34837596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic and Safety Roles in Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.
    Cao T; Feng Y; Huang Q; Wan T; Liu J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Dec; 25(12):990-8. PubMed ID: 26584414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
    Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study.
    Wang H; Li D; Wang C; Wang X; Yu M; Zhang X; Li L; Zeng Q; Long Z; Zheng W; Liu G; Wang D
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):124. PubMed ID: 35282041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.