These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32859489)
1. To Swan or Not to Swan: Indications, Alternatives, and Future Directions. Rozental O; Thalappillil R; White RS; Tam CW J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb; 35(2):600-615. PubMed ID: 32859489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. Wiesenack C; Prasser C; Keyl C; Rödīg G J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):584-8. PubMed ID: 11687999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of bedside transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring for goal-directed hemodynamic management after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Mutoh T; Kazumata K; Ishikawa T; Terasaka S Stroke; 2009 Jul; 40(7):2368-74. PubMed ID: 19461028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volume-limited versus pressure-limited hemodynamic management in septic and nonseptic shock. Trof RJ; Beishuizen A; Cornet AD; de Wit RJ; Girbes AR; Groeneveld AB Crit Care Med; 2012 Apr; 40(4):1177-85. PubMed ID: 22202713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of cardiac output measures by transpulmonary thermodilution, pulse contour analysis, and pulmonary artery thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a subgroup analysis of the cardiovascular anaesthesia registry at a single tertiary centre. Cho YJ; Koo CH; Kim TK; Hong DM; Jeon Y J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Dec; 30(6):771-782. PubMed ID: 26429135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of invasive and less-invasive techniques of cardiac output measurement under different haemodynamic conditions in a pig model. Bajorat J; Hofmockel R; Vagts DA; Janda M; Pohl B; Beck C; Noeldge-Schomburg G Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2006 Jan; 23(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16390561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients. Teboul JL; Saugel B; Cecconi M; De Backer D; Hofer CK; Monnet X; Perel A; Pinsky MR; Reuter DA; Rhodes A; Squara P; Vincent JL; Scheeren TW Intensive Care Med; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1350-9. PubMed ID: 27155605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transesophageal Doppler reliably tracks changes in cardiac output in comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in cardiac surgery patients. Møller-Sørensen H; Cordtz J; Østergaard M; Nilsson JC; Hansen KL J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Feb; 31(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 26578096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology. Breukers RB; Jansen JR Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update. Sangkum L; Liu GL; Yu L; Yan H; Kaye AD; Liu H J Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):461-80. PubMed ID: 26961819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter. Lamia B; Kim HK; Severyn DA; Pinsky MR J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transpulmonary thermodilution techniques in the haemodynamically unstable patient. Beurton A; Teboul JL; Monnet X Curr Opin Crit Care; 2019 Jun; 25(3):273-279. PubMed ID: 30883386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values. Asamoto M; Orii R; Otsuji M; Bougaki M; Imai Y; Yamada Y J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Techniques available for hemodynamic monitoring. Advantages and limitations]. Mateu Campos ML; Ferrándiz Sellés A; Gruartmoner de Vera G; Mesquida Febrer J; Sabatier Cloarec C; Poveda Hernández Y; García Nogales X Med Intensiva; 2012; 36(6):434-44. PubMed ID: 22743144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of volume clamp method-based continuous noninvasive cardiac output (CNCO) measurement versus intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients. Wagner JY; Körner A; Schulte-Uentrop L; Kubik M; Reichenspurner H; Kluge S; Reuter DA; Saugel B J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Apr; 32(2):235-244. PubMed ID: 28540614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]