These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32860186)
21. Environmental and economic benefits of the recovery of materials in a municipal solid waste management system. De Feo G; Ferrara C; Finelli A; Grosso A Environ Technol; 2019 Mar; 40(7):903-911. PubMed ID: 29187068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Emission reduction benefits and efficiency of e-waste recycling in China. Yang H; Zhang S; Ye W; Qin Y; Xu M; Han L Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():541-549. PubMed ID: 31765974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity analysis and improvements of the recycling rate in municipal solid waste life cycle assessment: Focus on a Latin American developing context. Ferronato N; Moresco L; Guisbert Lizarazu GE; Gorritty Portillo MA; Conti F; Torretta V Waste Manag; 2021 Jun; 128():1-15. PubMed ID: 33957429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques. Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating the Carbon Emission of Construction Waste Recycling Using Grey Model and Life Cycle Assessment: A Case Study of Shanghai. Wang T; Li K; Liu D; Yang Y; Wu D Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An incentive-based source separation model for sustainable municipal solid waste management in China. Xu W; Zhou C; Lan Y; Jin J; Cao A Waste Manag Res; 2015 May; 33(5):469-76. PubMed ID: 25819930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Future improvements on performance of an EU landfill directive driven municipal solid waste management for a city in England. Wang D; Tang YT; Long G; Higgitt D; He J; Robinson D Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():452-463. PubMed ID: 31739279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Artificial intelligence applications for sustainable solid waste management practices in Australia: A systematic review. Andeobu L; Wibowo S; Grandhi S Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 834():155389. PubMed ID: 35460765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cost recovery of municipal solid waste management in small cities of inland China. Ren X; Hu S Waste Manag Res; 2014 Apr; 32(4):340-7. PubMed ID: 24633554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Source analysis of municipal solid waste in a mega-city (Guangzhou): Challenges or opportunities? Tang J; Wei L; Su M; Zhang H; Chang X; Liu Y; Wang N; Xiao E; Ekberg C; Steenari BM; Xiao T Waste Manag Res; 2018 Dec; 36(12):1166-1176. PubMed ID: 30112977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optimization of recyclable MSW recycling network: A Chinese case of Shanghai. Lv J; Dong H; Geng Y; Li H Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():763-772. PubMed ID: 31809962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative environmental assessment of alternative waste management strategies in developing regions: A case study in Kazakhstan. Noya I; Inglezakis V; González-García S; Katsou E; Feijoo G; Moreira MT Waste Manag Res; 2018 Aug; 36(8):689-697. PubMed ID: 30024352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Governance tools: Improving the circular economy through the promotion of the economic sustainability of waste picker organizations. Ribeiro Siman R; Yamane LH; de Lima Baldam R; Pardinho Tackla J; de Assis Lessa SF; Mendonça de Britto P Waste Manag; 2020 Mar; 105():148-169. PubMed ID: 32065883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Global reverse supply chain design for solid waste recycling under uncertainties and carbon emission constraint. Xu Z; Elomri A; Pokharel S; Zhang Q; Ming XG; Liu W Waste Manag; 2017 Jun; 64():358-370. PubMed ID: 28320621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The economic value of sustainable recycling and waste management policies: The case of a waste management crisis in South Korea. Ko S; Kim W; Shin SC; Shin J Waste Manag; 2020 Mar; 104():220-227. PubMed ID: 31982785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Resource recycling sustainability assessment in ready-mixed concrete manufactured on energy consumption and environmental safety in China. Wang CQ; Wang PX; Zhang MT Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(15):19521-19529. PubMed ID: 33655473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. M-GRCT: A Dynamic Circular Economy Model for the Optimal Design of Waste Management Systems in Low-Income Municipalities. Vargas-Terranova CA; Rodrigo-Ilarri J; Rodrigo-Clavero ME; Rozo-Arango MA Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Feb; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35270375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Towards increased recycling of household waste: Documenting cascading effects and material efficiency of commingled recyclables and biowaste collection. Cimpan C; Rothmann M; Hamelin L; Wenzel H J Environ Manage; 2015 Jul; 157():69-83. PubMed ID: 25884890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Nitrogen flow characteristics of solid waste in China. Zhao Y; Zhou Q; Hidetoshi K; Luo L Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 208():111596. PubMed ID: 33396117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Resource management performance in Bahrain: a systematic analysis of municipal waste management, secondary material flows and organizational aspects. Al Sabbagh MK; Velis CA; Wilson DC; Cheeseman CR Waste Manag Res; 2012 Aug; 30(8):813-24. PubMed ID: 22584268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]