230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32860303)
1. Modelling technical and biological biases in macroinvertebrate community assessment from bulk preservative using multiple metabarcoding markers.
Martins FMS; Porto M; Feio MJ; Egeter B; Bonin A; Serra SRQ; Taberlet P; Beja P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3221-3238. PubMed ID: 32860303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing changes in stream macroinvertebrate communities across ecological gradients using morphological versus DNA metabarcoding approaches.
Martins FMS; Feio MJ; Porto M; Filipe AF; Bonin A; Serra SRQ; Alves PC; Taberlet P; Beja P
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 797():149030. PubMed ID: 34311381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of markers for the monitoring of freshwater benthic biodiversity through DNA metabarcoding.
Ficetola GF; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Meyer A; Dejean T; Gaboriaud C; Usseglio-Polatera P; Taberlet P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3189-3202. PubMed ID: 32920861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Have the cake and eat it: Optimizing nondestructive DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrate samples for freshwater biomonitoring.
Martins FMS; Galhardo M; Filipe AF; Teixeira A; Pinheiro P; Paupério J; Alves PC; Beja P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Jul; 19(4):863-876. PubMed ID: 30901128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass--Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol.
Elbrecht V; Leese F
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130324. PubMed ID: 26154168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: Testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering.
Meyer A; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Ficetola GF; Beisel JN; Bouquerel J; Wagner P; Gaboriaud C; Leese F; Dejean T; Taberlet P; Usseglio-Polatera P
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 33150613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Taxonomic accuracy and complementarity between bulk and eDNA metabarcoding provides an alternative to morphology for biological assessment of freshwater macroinvertebrates.
Múrria C; Wangensteen OS; Somma S; Väisänen L; Fortuño P; Arnedo MA; Prat N
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jul; 935():173243. PubMed ID: 38761946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hidden diversity: DNA metabarcoding reveals hyper-diverse benthic invertebrate communities.
Gleason JE; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
BMC Ecol Evol; 2023 May; 23(1):19. PubMed ID: 37198575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol.
Hajibabaei M; Spall JL; Shokralla S; van Konynenburg S
BMC Ecol; 2012 Dec; 12():28. PubMed ID: 23259585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Watered-down biodiversity? A comparison of metabarcoding results from DNA extracted from matched water and bulk tissue biomonitoring samples.
Hajibabaei M; Porter TM; Robinson CV; Baird DJ; Shokralla S; Wright MTG
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0225409. PubMed ID: 31830042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Freshwater diatom biomonitoring through benthic kick-net metabarcoding.
Maitland VC; Robinson CV; Porter TM; Hajibabaei M
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242143. PubMed ID: 33206700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding: Surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches.
Marquina D; Esparza-Salas R; Roslin T; Ronquist F
Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1516-1530. PubMed ID: 31379089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DNA metabarcoding from sample fixative as a quick and voucher-preserving biodiversity assessment method
Zizka VMA; Leese F; Peinert B; Geiger MF
Genome; 2019 Mar; 62(3):122-136. PubMed ID: 30457888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased performance of DNA metabarcoding of macroinvertebrates by taxonomic sorting.
Beentjes KK; Speksnijder AGCL; Schilthuizen M; Hoogeveen M; Pastoor R; van der Hoorn BB
PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226527. PubMed ID: 31841568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing diversity levels in environmental samples: DNA sequence capture and metabarcoding approaches using 18S and COI genes.
Giebner H; Langen K; Bourlat SJ; Kukowka S; Mayer C; Astrin JJ; Misof B; Fonseca VG
Mol Ecol Resour; 2020 Sep; 20(5):1333-1345. PubMed ID: 32462738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biases in bulk: DNA metabarcoding of marine communities and the methodology involved.
van der Loos LM; Nijland R
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3270-3288. PubMed ID: 32779312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding detects suites of environmental gradients from an urban harbour.
Robinson CV; Porter TM; McGee KM; McCusker M; Wright MTG; Hajibabaei M
Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):10556. PubMed ID: 35732669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sorting things out: Assessing effects of unequal specimen biomass on DNA metabarcoding.
Elbrecht V; Peinert B; Leese F
Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(17):6918-6926. PubMed ID: 28904771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
