BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32861593)

  • 1. Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)-part 2: subjective views among the cytopathology community.
    Sauter JL; Chen Y; Alex D; Balassanian R; Cuda J; Flanagan MB; Griffith CC; Illei P; Johnson DN; McGrath CM; Randolph ML; Reynolds JP; Spiczka AJ; van Zante A; VanderLaan PA;
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):570-578. PubMed ID: 32861593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid on-site evaluation-Part 1: objective practice patterns.
    VanderLaan PA; Chen Y; Alex D; Balassanian R; Cuda J; Hoda RS; Illei PB; McGrath CM; Randolph ML; Reynolds JP; Spiczka AJ; VandeHaar MA; van Zante A; Sauter JL;
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(6):333-341. PubMed ID: 31495750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Small core needle biopsies in cytology practice: a survey of members of the American Society of Cytopathology.
    Thrall MJ; Vrbin C; Barkan GA; Monaco SE; Pambuccian SE; Pantanowitz L; Pitman MB; Kurtycz DFI
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):310-321. PubMed ID: 32653451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing digital and telecytology practices post COVID-19 comparing ASC survey results from 2016 to 2023.
    Chen-Yost HI; Bammert C; Hao W; Heymann JJ; Lin DM; Marotti J; Waraksa-Deutsch T; Huang M; Krishnamurti U; Lin O; Ly A; Moatamed N; Pantanowitz L; Roy-Chowdhuri S
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(3):194-204. PubMed ID: 38582697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality metrics in non-gynecologic cytology: results from the 2022 American Society of Cytopathology survey.
    Torous VF; VandenBussche CJ; Randolph ML; Cuda JM; Manucha V;
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(4):258-266. PubMed ID: 37012178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telecytology rapid onsite evaluation, with real-time communication between cytopathologist, cytotechnologist, and proceduralist, offers better adequacy rates for lymph node, but not thyroid, fine-needle aspirations.
    Post R; Doxzon K; Goldberg A
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2023; 12(6):407-414. PubMed ID: 37620222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice in 2021: Results of a College of American Pathologists Survey.
    Li Z; Tabbara SO; Nwosu A; Souers RJ; Goyal A; Kurian EM; Lin X; VandenBussche C; Nguyen LN
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 Jun; 148(6):677-685. PubMed ID: 37702405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing competency for remote telecytology rapid on-site evaluation using pre-recorded dynamic video streaming.
    Monaco SE; Han M; Dietz R; Xing J; Cuda J; Pantanowitz L
    Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):411-418. PubMed ID: 31808209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. American Society of Cytopathology Telecytology validation recommendations for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).
    Lin O; Alperstein S; Barkan GA; Cuda JM; Kezlarian B; Jhala D; Jin X; Mehrotra S; Monaco SE; Rao J; Saieg M; Thrall M; Pantanowitz L
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2024; 13(2):111-121. PubMed ID: 38310002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology.
    VandenBussche CJ; Nwosu A; Souers R; Sundling KE; Brainard J; Goyal A; Lin X; Masood S; Nguyen L; Roberson J; Tabbara SO; Booth C
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2024 May; 148(5):531-537. PubMed ID: 37603681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cytologic rapid on-site evaluation of transthoracic computed tomography-guided lung needle biopsies: who should perform ROSE? A cross-institutional analysis of procedural and diagnostic outcomes.
    Marotti JD; Rao KP; Brister KJ; Gutmann EJ; Tsapakos MJ; Sheiman R; Wang HH; VanderLaan PA
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(3):160-169. PubMed ID: 31051697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An international outreach from the American Society of Cytopathology: Worldvision Cytopathology Contest.
    Barkan GA; Jenkins E; Rossi ED
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(4):278-285. PubMed ID: 32499138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current practice patterns in nongynecologic and fine-needle aspiration cytology.
    Odronic SI; Roberson J; Booth CN
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2015; 4(5):239-245. PubMed ID: 31051760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Telecytology implementation: Deployment of telecytology for rapid on-site evaluations at an Academic Medical Center.
    Monaco SE; Koah AE; Xing J; Ahmed I; Cuda J; Cunningham J; Metahri D; Progar A; Pantanowitz L
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):206-213. PubMed ID: 30588767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. General quality practices in gynecologic cytopathology: findings from the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference working group 3.
    Tworek J; Nayar R; Savaloja L; Tabbara S; Thomas N; Winkler B; Howell LP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):190-8. PubMed ID: 23368861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Touch imprint (TI) cytology of needle core biopsies (NCB) in pathology laboratories: A practice survey of participants in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) Non Gynecologic Cytopathology (NGC) Education Program.
    Padmanabhan V; Barkan GA; Tabatabai L; Souers R; Nayar R; Crothers BA
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):149-155. PubMed ID: 30468295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cytology of spontaneous nipple discharge--is it worth it? Performance of nipple discharge preparations in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology.
    Moriarty AT; Schwartz MR; Laucirica R; Booth CN; Auger M; Thomas NE; Souers RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Aug; 137(8):1039-42. PubMed ID: 23899058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference on good laboratory practices in gynecologic cytology: background, rationale, and organization.
    Tworek JA; Henry MR; Blond B; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Feb; 137(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 23368857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Current State of Cytologic-Histologic Correlation Implementation for North American and International Laboratories: Results of the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee Laboratory Practices in Gynecologic Cytology Survey.
    Nguyen LN; Crothers BA; Davey DD; Natale KE; Nunez AL; Harkcom T; Mody DR; Barkan GA; Souers RJ; Tabatabai ZL; Booth CN
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 147(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 35271691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Survey of medical training in cytopathology carried out by the journal Cytopathology.
    Anshu ; Herbert A; Cochand-Priollet B; Cross P; Desai M; Dina R; Duskova J; Evered A; Farnsworth A; Gray W; Gupta SS; Kapila K; Kardum-Skelin I; Kloboves-Prevodnik V; Kobayashi TK; Koutselini H; Olszewski W; Onal B; Pitman MB; Marinsek Z; Sauer T; Schenck U; Schmitt F; Shabalova I; Smith JH; Tani E; Vass L; Vielh P; Wiener H
    Cytopathology; 2010 Jun; 21(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 20482722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.