129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32862586)
61. Correlations between the sizes of lateral pelvic lymph nodes and metastases in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Ishihara S; Kawai K; Tanaka T; Hata K; Nozawa H
ANZ J Surg; 2018 Dec; 88(12):1306-1310. PubMed ID: 29974631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Stratifies and Predicts Survival of High-Risk Individuals Among Stage III Rectal Cancer Patients.
Lee CW; Wilkinson KH; Sheka AC; Leverson GE; Kennedy GD
Oncologist; 2016 Apr; 21(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 26975865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
Fischerová D; Cibula D
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Prognostic significance of apical lymph node metastasis in patients with node-positive rectal cancer.
Peng J; Wu H; Li X; Sheng W; Huang D; Guan Z; Wang M; Cai S
Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jan; 15(1):e13-20. PubMed ID: 23057847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A novel data-driven prognostic model for staging of colorectal cancer.
Manilich EA; Kiran RP; Radivoyevitch T; Lavery I; Fazio VW; Remzi FH
J Am Coll Surg; 2011 Nov; 213(5):579-588, 588.e1-2. PubMed ID: 21925905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Preoperative evaluation of pelvic lateral lymph node of patients with lower rectal cancer: comparison study of MR imaging and CT in 53 patients.
Arii K; Takifuji K; Yokoyama S; Matsuda K; Higashiguchi T; Tominaga T; Oku Y; Tani M; Yamaue H
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2006 Sep; 391(5):449-54. PubMed ID: 16847648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis.
Greene FL; Stewart AK; Norton HJ
J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):1778-84. PubMed ID: 14769855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Role of lymph nodes in rectal carcinoma].
Vorburger S; Metzger U
Zentralbl Chir; 2000; 125(10):852-62. PubMed ID: 11098582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. [A Case of Pelvic Schwannoma, Mimicking Metastasis of Rectal Carcinoma].
Watanabe Y; Baba H; Matsuzawa T; Fukuchi M; Kumagai Y; Ishibashi K; Mochiki E; Ishida H
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2015 Nov; 42(12):2262-4. PubMed ID: 26805331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. The role of sentinel lymph node mapping in staging of colon and rectal cancer.
Esser S; Reilly WT; Riley LB; Eyvazzadeh C; Arcona S
Dis Colon Rectum; 2001 Jun; 44(6):850-4; discussion 854-6. PubMed ID: 11391147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) for paraaortic lymph node metastasis from left-sided colon and rectal cancer.
Nakai N; Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y; Numata M; Furutani A; Yamaoka Y; Manabe S; Sawada A
Asian J Surg; 2020 Jun; 43(6):676-682. PubMed ID: 31570183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [The value of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging].
Radovanović Z; Radovanović D; Breberina M; Petrović T; Golubović A; Bokorov B
Med Pregl; 2008; 61(11-12):557-61. PubMed ID: 19368271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal cancer; prognostic significance in addition to the 7th edition of the TNM classification.
Dekker JW; Peeters KC; Putter H; Vahrmeijer AL; van de Velde CJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Dec; 36(12):1180-6. PubMed ID: 20884164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Ultrasound/CT combined with serum CEA/CA19.9 in the diagnosis and prognosis of rectal cancer.
Zhang B; Sun Z; Song M; Ma S; Tian Y; Kong Q
J BUON; 2018; 23(3):592-597. PubMed ID: 30003724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Histologic grade of metastatic lymph node and prognosis of rectal cancer.
Takahashi K; Mori T; Yasuno M
Dis Colon Rectum; 2000 Oct; 43(10 Suppl):S40-6. PubMed ID: 11052477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [The significance of lymph node yield in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy].
Zhu LY; Gao ZD; Ye YJ
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 22(9):896-900. PubMed ID: 31550831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Risk factors and therapeutic significance of inguinal lymph node metastasis in advanced lower rectal cancer.
Shiratori H; Nozawa H; Kawai K; Hata K; Tanaka T; Kaneko M; Emoto S; Sonoda H; Ishihara S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2020 Apr; 35(4):655-664. PubMed ID: 32009191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of imaging TNM [(i)TNM] and pathological TNM [pTNM] in staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.
Gdeedo A; Van Schil P; Corthouts B; Van Mieghem F; Van Meerbeeck J; Van Marck E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Aug; 12(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 9288511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Accuracy of preoperative MRI in predicting pathology stage in rectal cancers: node-for-node matched histopathology validation of MRI features.
Park JS; Jang YJ; Choi GS; Park SY; Kim HJ; Kang H; Cho SH
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Jan; 57(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 24316943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Evaluation of dual energy spectral CT in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Initial experience.
Liu H; Yan F; Pan Z; Lin X; Luo X; Shi C; Chen X; Wang B; Zhang H
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 84(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25497234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
