234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32862688)
21. Early tibial loosening of the cemented ATTUNE knee arthroplasty - Just a question of design?
Jaeger S; Eissler M; Schwarze M; Schonhoff M; Kretzer JP; Bitsch RG
Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():170-175. PubMed ID: 33933907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Similar migration for medial congruent and cruciate-retaining tibial components in an anatomic TKA system: a randomized controlled trial of 60 patients followed with RSA for 2 years.
Christensson A; Tveit M; Kesteris U; Flivik G
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():68-74. PubMed ID: 34633885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The assessment of the stability of the tibial component of a novel knee arthroplasty system using radiostereometric analysis.
Turgeon TR; Gascoyne TC; Laende EK; Dunbar MJ; Bohm ER; Richardson CG
Bone Joint J; 2018 Dec; 100-B(12):1579-1584. PubMed ID: 30499327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. High rate of radiolucent lines following the cemented original design of the ATTUNE total knee arthroplasty.
Prodromidis AD; Chloros GD; Thivaios GC; Sutton PM; Pandit H; Giannoudis PV; Charalambous CP
Bone Joint J; 2023 Jun; 105-B(6):610-621. PubMed ID: 37259548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early and mid-term results with the ATTUNE total knee replacement system compared to PFC Sigma: a prospective comparative study.
Willburger RE; Oberberg S
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Nov; 17(1):509. PubMed ID: 36434699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Migration of all-polyethylene compared with metal-backed tibial components in cemented total knee arthroplasty.
Van Hamersveld KT; Marang-Van De Mheen PJ; Nelissen RGHH; Toksvig-Larsen S
Acta Orthop; 2018 Aug; 89(4):412-417. PubMed ID: 29714073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cementless Versus Cemented Tibial Fixation in Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Trial.
Nivbrant NO; Khan RJK; Fick DP; Haebich S; Smith E
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Jun; 102(12):1075-1082. PubMed ID: 32559052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cement debonding behaviors of the various tibial components of the ATTUNE knee system and its predecessors: Is a cement-in-cement revision an alternative?
Jaeger S; Eissler M; Schwarze M; Schonhoff M; Kretzer JP; Bitsch RG
Knee; 2021 Dec; 33():185-192. PubMed ID: 34638017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Modern cemented total knee arthroplasty design shows a higher incidence of radiolucent lines compared to its predecessor.
Staats K; Wannmacher T; Weihs V; Koller U; Kubista B; Windhager R
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Apr; 27(4):1148-1155. PubMed ID: 30244340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. No difference in terms of radiostereometric analysis between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.
Schotanus MGM; Pilot P; Kaptein BL; Draijer WF; Tilman PBJ; Vos R; Kort NP
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Sep; 25(9):2978-2985. PubMed ID: 27120194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Does lucency equate to revision? A five-year retrospective review of Attune and Triathlon total knee arthroplasty.
O'Donovan P; McAleese T; Harty J
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2023 Nov; 31(11):4773-4781. PubMed ID: 37516985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Unexpected high rate of revision of a modern cemented fixed bearing modular posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Steele JR; Wellman SS
Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):137-144. PubMed ID: 34053294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis.
Campi S; Kendrick BJL; Kaptein BL; Valstar ER; Jackson WFM; Dodd CAF; Price AJ; Murray DW
Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():383-390. PubMed ID: 33408039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Clinical Outcome of Medial Pivot Compared With Press-Fit Condylar Sigma Cruciate-Retaining Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Oct; 32(10):3016-3023. PubMed ID: 28601246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparable Stability of Cemented vs Press-Fit Placed Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Mild to Moderate Bone Loss: 6.5-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial With Radiostereometric Analysis.
Kosse NM; van Hellemondt GG; Wymenga AB; Heesterbeek PJ
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 27554783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Uncemented vs Cemented Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 30.
Boyle KK; Nodzo SR; Ferraro JT; Augenblick DJ; Pavlesen S; Phillips MJ
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1082-1088. PubMed ID: 29248485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictive value of short-term migration in determining long-term stable fixation in cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties.
Laende EK; Richardson CG; Dunbar MJ
Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):55-60. PubMed ID: 31256645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. No Difference in Implant Micromotion Between Hybrid Fixation and Fully Cemented Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Radiostereometric Analysis of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Bone Loss.
Heesterbeek PJ; Wymenga AB; van Hellemondt GG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(16):1359-69. PubMed ID: 27535438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Knee joint kinematics, fixation and function related to joint area design in total knee arthroplasty.
Uvehammer J
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 2001 Feb; 72(299):1-52. PubMed ID: 11381581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison Between the Attune and PFC Sigma in Total Knee Arthroplasty: No Difference in Patellar Clunk and Crepitus or Anterior Knee Pain.
Bateman DK; Preston JS; Mennona S; Gui E; Kayiaros S
Orthopedics; 2020 Nov; 43(6):e508-e514. PubMed ID: 32818287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
