222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32863275)
1. Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
Lundin ES; Carlsson P; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32863275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Avondstondt AM; Wallenstein M; D'Adamo CR; Ehsanipoor RM
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):93-96. PubMed ID: 28439744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective randomized assessment of quality of life between open and robotic hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.
Lundin ES; Wodlin NB; Nilsson L; Kjölhede P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 30923082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic single site versus robotic multiport hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a case control study.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Mancini E; Baiocco E; Patrizi L; Saltari M; di Luca Sidozzi A; Sperduti I; Pomati G; Vizza E
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Jul; 27(4):e39. PubMed ID: 27171672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing Single-Site and Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy with Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping for Endometrial Cancer: Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis.
Moukarzel LA; Sinno AK; Fader AN; Tanner EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):977-983. PubMed ID: 28599884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT.
Cooper K; Breeman S; Scott NW; Scotland G; Hernández R; Clark TJ; Hawe J; Hawthorn R; Phillips K; Wileman S; McCormack K; Norrie J; Bhattacharya S
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Sep; 23(53):1-108. PubMed ID: 31577219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer - complications, women´s experiences, quality of life and a health economic evaluation.
Herling SF
Dan Med J; 2016 Jul; 63(7):. PubMed ID: 27399986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective evaluation of the perioperative drug use and comparison of its cost in robotic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer.
Agarwal R; Rajanbabu A; Unnikrishnan UG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):665-672. PubMed ID: 29569172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic vs. open surgery in obese women with low-grade endometrial cancer: comparison of costs and quality of life measures.
Sofer A; Magnezi R; Eitan R; Raban O; Tal O; Smorgic N; Vaknin Z
Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Nov; 9(1):60. PubMed ID: 33138857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis.
Lindfors A; Åkesson Å; Staf C; Sjöli P; Sundfeldt K; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 May; 28(4):692-699. PubMed ID: 29557825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with Class III obesity or higher.
Kosa SD; Ferguson SE; Panzarella T; Lau S; Abitbol J; Samouëlian V; Giede C; Steed H; Renkosinski B; Gien LT; Bernardini MQ
J Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 125(4):747-753. PubMed ID: 34904716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long term resource consequences of a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery for women with early stage endometrial cancer.
Korsholm M; Gyrd-Hansen D; Mogensen O; Möller S; Sopina L; Joergensen SL; Jensen PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):411-419. PubMed ID: 31176554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 29178955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With Morcellation Compared With Abdominal Hysterectomy for Presumed Myomas.
Rutstein SE; Siedhoff MT; Geller EJ; Doll KM; Wu JM; Clarke-Pearson DL; Wheeler SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):223-33. PubMed ID: 26475764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
