202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32864771)
1. The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.
Hao M; Li L; Zhang H; Li L; Liu R; Yu Y
J Clin Lab Anal; 2020 Dec; 34(12):e23514. PubMed ID: 32864771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Combined Karyotype Analysis and Chromosome Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis: A Cohort Study of 3710 Pregnancies.
Wang J; Wang D; Yin Y; Deng Y; Ye M; Wei P; Zhang Z; Chen C; Qin S; Wang X
Genet Res (Camb); 2022; 2022():6791439. PubMed ID: 36636555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal mosaicism, should conventional karyotype always be performed?
Su L; Wu X; Liang B; Lin N; Xie X; Cai M; Zheng L; Wang M; Xu L
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Dec; 49(12):2836-2848. PubMed ID: 37844871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The clinical use of chromosomal microarray analysis in detection of fetal chromosomal rearrangements: a study from China Mainland.
Wu Y; Wang Y; Tao J; Han X; Zhao X; Liu C; Gao L; Cheng W
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 May; 212():44-50. PubMed ID: 28340467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of chromosome microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
Xia M; Yang X; Fu J; Teng Z; Lv Y; Yu L
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):696. PubMed ID: 33198662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in 18,369 Cases of Amniocentesis.
Kang H; Wang L; Xie Y; Chen Y; Gao C; Li X; Hu Y; Liu Q
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e2058-e2068. PubMed ID: 37336233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The value of combined use of chromosomal karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis].
Rao H; Liu Y; Lu Q; Huang N; Zhou J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 37(4):392-396. PubMed ID: 32219820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The value of chromosomal microarray analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicisms].
Zheng J; An N; Li M; Xu M; Guan Y; Liu J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2023 May; 40(5):527-531. PubMed ID: 37102283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of a Chromosomal Microarray for Prenatal Diagnosis Using a Prospective Cohort of Pregnancies with Increased Risk for Chromosome Abnormalities.
Wright D; Carey L; Battersby S; Nguyen T; Clarke M; Nash B; Gulesserian E; Cross J; Darmanian A
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2016 Dec; 20(12):791-798. PubMed ID: 27690282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prenatal microarray analysis as second-tier diagnostic test: single-center prospective study.
Schmid M; Stary S; Springer S; Bettelheim D; Husslein P; Streubel B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 23292918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chromosomal microarray vs. NIPS: analysis of 5541 low-risk pregnancies.
Sagi-Dain L; Cohen Vig L; Kahana S; Yacobson S; Tenne T; Agmon-Fishman I; Klein C; Matar R; Basel-Salmon L; Maya I
Genet Med; 2019 Nov; 21(11):2462-2467. PubMed ID: 31123319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of fetuses with central nervous system anomalies using chromosomal microarray analysis: a seven-year single-center retrospective study.
Zhuang J; Zhang N; Chen Y; Jiang Y; Chen X; Chen W; Chen C
Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):2271. PubMed ID: 38280885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy and value of chromosomal microarray analysis for chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal detection: A prospective clinical study.
Huang H; Wang Y; Zhang M; Lin N; An G; He D; Chen M; Chen L; Xu L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e25999. PubMed ID: 34011095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytogenetic microarray in structurally normal and abnormal foetuses: a five year experience elucidating increasing acceptance and clinical utility.
Lallar M; Srivastava P; Rai A; Saxena D; Mandal K; Phadke SR
J Genet; 2019 Mar; 98():. PubMed ID: 30945666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Karyotype analysis of amniotic fluid cells and comparison of chromosomal abnormality rate during second trimester].
Zhang YP; Wu JP; Li XT; Lei CX; Xu JZ; Yin M
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Sep; 46(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 22176986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal diagnosis of mosaicism for double aneuploidy of 47,XXY and trisomy 7 (48,XXY,+7) at amniocentesis in a pregnancy with a favorable outcome.
Chen CP; Tsai HT; Chern SR; Wu PS; Chen SW; Wu FT; Chen YY; Town DD; Chen WL; Lee MS; Wang W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):543-548. PubMed ID: 33966745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with mosaic ring chromosome 13: Case report and review of the literature.
Hu XN; Li LL; Shi QY; Hu ZM; Zhang HG; Jiang YT; Liu RZ
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 60(3):554-558. PubMed ID: 33966748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prenatal genetic diagnosis of omphalocele by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing.
Shi X; Tang H; Lu J; Yang X; Ding H; Wu J
Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 34374610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators.
Qian G; Cai L; Yao H; Dong X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Nov; 23(1):784. PubMed ID: 37951870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in diagnostic assessment of abnormal Down syndrome screening results.
Kang H; Wang L; Li X; Gao C; Xie Y; Hu Y
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Nov; 22(1):813. PubMed ID: 36333674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
