These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32865144)
1. Intergroup Contact Reduces Dehumanization and Meta-Dehumanization: Cross-Sectional, Longitudinal, and Quasi-Experimental Evidence From 16 Samples in Five Countries. Bruneau E; Hameiri B; Moore-Berg SL; Kteily N Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Jun; 47(6):906-920. PubMed ID: 32865144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. They see us as less than human: Metadehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Kteily N; Hodson G; Bruneau E J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Mar; 110(3):343-70. PubMed ID: 26963763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-humanization reduces prejudice, even under high intergroup threat. Pavetich M; Stathi S J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Mar; 120(3):651-671. PubMed ID: 32700957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Moore-Berg SL; Ankori-Karlinsky LO; Hameiri B; Bruneau E Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Jun; 117(26):14864-14872. PubMed ID: 32527858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Backlash: The Politics and Real-World Consequences of Minority Group Dehumanization. Kteily N; Bruneau E Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jan; 43(1):87-104. PubMed ID: 28903649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization. Kteily N; Bruneau E; Waytz A; Cotterill S J Pers Soc Psychol; 2015 Nov; 109(5):901-31. PubMed ID: 26121523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution. Enock FE; Tipper SP; Over H Cognition; 2021 Nov; 216():104865. PubMed ID: 34358774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Nature of Islamophobia: A Test of a Tripartite View in Five Countries. Uenal F; Bergh R; Sidanius J; Zick A; Kimel S; Kunst JR Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Feb; 47(2):275-292. PubMed ID: 32458735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization. Enock FE; Flavell JC; Tipper SP; Over H Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104682. PubMed ID: 33773426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations. Putra IE Span J Psychol; 2016 Jul; 19():E46. PubMed ID: 27426239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minority group members' theories of intergroup contact: a case study of British Muslims' conceptualizations of 'Islamophobia' and social change. Hopkins N; Kahani-Hopkins V Br J Soc Psychol; 2006 Jun; 45(Pt 2):245-64. PubMed ID: 16762100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Christ O; Schmid K; Lolliot S; Swart H; Stolle D; Tausch N; Al Ramiah A; Wagner U; Vertovec S; Hewstone M Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Mar; 111(11):3996-4000. PubMed ID: 24591627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thinking about God discourages dehumanization of religious outgroups. Smith JM; Pasek MH; Vishkin A; Johnson KA; Shackleford C; Ginges J J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2586-2603. PubMed ID: 35389741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The enemy as animal: Symmetric dehumanization during asymmetric warfare. Bruneau E; Kteily N PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181422. PubMed ID: 28746412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]