These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32865486)

  • 1. Effect of (Mis)Matched Compression Speed on Speech Recognition in Bimodal Listeners.
    Spirrov D; Kludt E; Verschueren E; Büchner A; Francart T
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520948974. PubMed ID: 32865486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Emotional Responses to Non-Speech Sounds for Hearing-aid and Bimodal Cochlear-Implant Listeners.
    Tawdrous MM; D'Onofrio KL; Gifford R; Picou EM
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221083091. PubMed ID: 35435773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG; Galvin JJ
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: The complementarity of electric and acoustic hearing in bimodal patients.
    Lambriks L; van Hoof M; George E; Devocht E
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0277161. PubMed ID: 37079550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners.
    Digeser FM; Engler M; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 31809219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contribution of a frequency-compression hearing aid to contralateral cochlear implant performance.
    Perreau AE; Bentler RA; Tyler RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Feb; 24(2):105-20. PubMed ID: 23357804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.
    Davidson LS; Firszt JB; Brenner C; Cadieux JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 25879243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bimodal benefit for cochlear implant listeners with different grades of hearing loss in the opposite ear.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Digeser F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Aug; 138(8):713-721. PubMed ID: 29553839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech Understanding With Bimodal Stimulation Is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1158-1171. PubMed ID: 32833388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients.
    English R; Plant K; Maciejczyk M; Cowan R
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S45-50. PubMed ID: 26853233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the Effect of Different Hearing Aid Fitting Methods in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; van der Schroeff MP; Goedegebure A
    Am J Audiol; 2019 Mar; 28(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30383163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Neuman AC; Zeman A; Neukam J; Wang B; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):621-635. PubMed ID: 30067559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Localization and Speech Reception in Noise for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Potts WB; Ramanna L; Perry T; Long CJ
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519831492. PubMed ID: 30791832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.