146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32865690)
1. Safety and efficacy of superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access for pelvic and/or lower calyceal renal calculi- a prospective observational comparative study.
Amaresh M; Hegde P; Chawla A; de la Rosette JJMCH; Laguna MP; Kriplani A
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):2155-2161. PubMed ID: 32865690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized comparison between superior calyceal access versus inferior calyceal access in PCNL for inferior calyceal stones with or without pelvic stones.
Singh V; Garg Y; Sharma K; Sinha RJ; Gupta S
Urolithiasis; 2016 Apr; 44(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 26188918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Supine pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Gamal W; Moursy E; Hussein M; Mmdouh A; Hammady A; Aldahshoury M
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):78.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25819602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Middle and Lower Calyceal Access for Renal Pelvis Stone in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Eryildirim B; Sarica K; Ustun F; Sevinc AH; Simsek B; Sahan A; Canakci C; Tarhan F
Urol Int; 2020; 104(9-10):758-764. PubMed ID: 32702697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of a single middle calyx access (MCA) in mini-PCNL.
Khadgi S; El-Nahas AR; Darrad M; Al-Terki A
Urolithiasis; 2020 Dec; 48(6):541-546. PubMed ID: 31822953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison among PCNL, Miniperc and Ultraminiperc for lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm: a prospective, comparative, multicenter and randomised study.
Bozzini G; Aydogan TB; Müller A; Sighinolfi MC; Besana U; Calori A; Lorenzo B; Govorov A; Pushkar DY; Pini G; Pastore AL; Romero-Otero J; Rocco B; Buizza C
BMC Urol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):67. PubMed ID: 32522171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Access Location Influence Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Staghorn Stones?
Yarimoglu S; Sahan M; Polat S; Cesur G; Koras O; Degirmenci T
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Sep; 31(9):1075-1080. PubMed ID: 34500524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upper pole access for complex lower pole renal calculi.
Aron M; Goel R; Kesarwani PK; Seth A; Gupta NP
BJU Int; 2004 Oct; 94(6):849-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 15476521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Thoracic Complications in Supracostal Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Kunwar AK; Upadhyaya AM; Tiwari K; Shrestha SB; Yadav CS; Dangol B; Shrestha PM
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2022 Nov; 20(2):361-365. PubMed ID: 36550713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lower calyceal and renal pelvic stones in preschool children: A comparative study of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
ElSheemy MS; Daw K; Habib E; Aboulela W; Fathy H; Shouman AM; El Ghoneimy M; Shoukry AI; Morsi HA; Badawy H
Int J Urol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):564-70. PubMed ID: 27173126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Miniaturized Ambulatory Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Lower Calyceal Renal Stones 10-20 mm: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Shabana W; Oquendo F; Hodhod A; Ahmad A; Alaref A; Trigo S; Hadi RA; Nour HH; Kotb A; Shahrour W; Elmansy H
Urology; 2021 Oct; 156():65-70. PubMed ID: 34097943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Lower Pole Stones.
Singh Dongol UM; Bohora S
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2018 Oct; 16(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 30455485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Challenging the wisdom of puncture at the calyceal fornix in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: feasibility and safety study with 137 patients operated via a non-calyceal percutaneous track.
Kyriazis I; Kallidonis P; Vasilas M; Panagopoulos V; Kamal W; Liatsikos E
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):795-801. PubMed ID: 27510761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.
Khadgi S; Shrestha B; Ibrahim H; Shrestha S; ElSheemy MS; Al-Kandari AM
Urolithiasis; 2017 Aug; 45(4):407-414. PubMed ID: 27704184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for managing renal calculi.
Memon WA; Khalid SE; Haider A; Saulat S; Khan SA; Quddus MB; Abid K
J Pak Med Assoc; 2021 Feb; 71(2(B)):602-607. PubMed ID: 33941943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supine versus prone PCNL in lower calyceal stone: Comparative study in a tertiary care center.
Choudhury S; Talukdar P; Mandal TK; Majhi TK
Urologia; 2021 May; 88(2):148-152. PubMed ID: 33028166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Management of Stone Containing Calyceal Diverticula: Associated Factors and Outcomes.
Parkhomenko E; Tran T; Thai J; Blum K; Gupta M
J Urol; 2017 Oct; 198(4):864-868. PubMed ID: 28483573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing complex renal calculi.
Singh R; Kankalia SP; Sabale V; Satav V; Mane D; Mulay A; Kadyan B; Thakur N
Urol Ann; 2015; 7(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 25657540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrograde nephrostomy access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a simple and safe technique.
Alotaibi KM
Urolithiasis; 2020 Apr; 48(2):175-181. PubMed ID: 31037404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The safety and efficacy of PCNL with supracostal approach in the treatment of renal stones.
Mousavi-Bahar SH; Mehrabi S; Moslemi MK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Dec; 43(4):983-7. PubMed ID: 21394440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
