These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Economic evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT, MRI and CE-CT in selection of colorectal liver metastases eligible for ablation - A cost-effectiveness analysis. Schnitzer ML; Buchner J; Biechele G; Grawe F; Ingenerf M; von Münchhausen N; Kaiser CG; Kunz WG; Froelich MF; Schmid-Tannwald C; Rübenthaler J Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jun; 163():110803. PubMed ID: 37004464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of MRI, CE-CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal liver metastases eligible for hepatic resection. Schnitzer ML; von Münchhausen N; Biechele G; Runtemund J; Grawe F; Geyer T; Kaiser CG; Haag F; Rübenthaler J; Froelich MF Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1161738. PubMed ID: 37554160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting suspected recurrence or metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma patients with negative diagnostic total body scan in Thailand: a decision analysis. Khiewvan B; Nopmaneejumruslers C; Pusuwan P; Tuchinda P; Tojinda N; Ubolnuch K J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Oct; 96(10):1350-64. PubMed ID: 24350419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cardiac resynchronisation (biventricular pacing) for heart failure: systematic review and economic model. Fox M; Mealing S; Anderson R; Dean J; Stein K; Price A; Taylor RS Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(47):iii-iv, ix-248. PubMed ID: 17999842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT on therapeutic decisions in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Georgakopoulos A; Pianou N; Kelekis N; Chatziioannou S Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):536-41. PubMed ID: 23116727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 18FDG-PET-CT in the follow-up of non-small cell lung cancer patients after radical radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: an economic evaluation. van Loon J; Grutters JP; Wanders R; Boersma L; Dingemans AM; Bootsma G; Geraedts W; Pitz C; Simons J; Brans B; Snoep G; Hochstenbag M; Lambin P; De Ruysscher D Eur J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 46(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 19944595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective study on diagnostic and prognostic significance of postoperative FDG PET/CT in recurrent colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison with MRI and tumor markers. Odalovic S; Stojiljkovic M; Sobic-Saranovic D; Pandurevic S; Brajkovic L; Milosevic I; Grozdic-Milojevic I; Artiko V Neoplasma; 2017; 64(6):954-961. PubMed ID: 28895416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FDG-PET/CT in indeterminate thyroid nodules: cost-utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. de Koster EJ; Vriens D; van Aken MO; Dijkhorst-Oei LT; Oyen WJG; Peeters RP; Schepers A; de Geus-Oei LF; van den Hout WB; Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Aug; 49(10):3452-3469. PubMed ID: 35435497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In patients with unprovoked VTE, does the addition of FDG PET/CT to a limited occult cancer screening strategy offer good value for money? A cost-effectiveness analysis from the publicly funded health care systems. Robin P; Kumar S; Salaun PY; Le Roux PY; Couturaud F; Planquette B; Merah A; Roy PM; Thavorn K; Le Gal G Thromb Res; 2018 Nov; 171():97-102. PubMed ID: 30268859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]