1497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32867428)
1. [Challenges and factors that influencing causal inference and interpretation, based on Mendelian randomization studies].
Wang YZ; Shen HB
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Aug; 41(8):1231-1236. PubMed ID: 32867428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity Analyses for Robust Causal Inference from Mendelian Randomization Analyses with Multiple Genetic Variants.
Burgess S; Bowden J; Fall T; Ingelsson E; Thompson SG
Epidemiology; 2017 Jan; 28(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 27749700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mendelian Randomization as an Approach to Assess Causality Using Observational Data.
Sekula P; Del Greco M F; Pattaro C; Köttgen A
J Am Soc Nephrol; 2016 Nov; 27(11):3253-3265. PubMed ID: 27486138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Mendelian randomization approach, used for causal inferences].
Wang LN; Zhang Z
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 38(4):547-552. PubMed ID: 28468080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mendelian randomization as a tool for causal inference in human nutrition and metabolism.
Larsson SC
Curr Opin Lipidol; 2021 Feb; 32(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 33278081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates.
Burgess S; Labrecque JA
Eur J Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 33(10):947-952. PubMed ID: 30039250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inferring the direction of a causal link and estimating its effect via a Bayesian Mendelian randomization approach.
Bucur IG; Claassen T; Heskes T
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):1081-1111. PubMed ID: 31146640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond Mendelian randomization: how to interpret evidence of shared genetic predictors.
Burgess S; Butterworth AS; Thompson JR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():208-16. PubMed ID: 26291580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].
Lin LJ; Wei YY; Zhang RY; Chen F
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 31177761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference about causation from examination of familial confounding (ICE FALCON): a model for assessing causation analogous to Mendelian randomization.
Li S; Bui M; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1259-1269. PubMed ID: 32500139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.
Burgess S; Daniel RM; Butterworth AS; Thompson SG;
Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 44(2):484-95. PubMed ID: 25150977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of instrumental variable estimators for Mendelian randomization.
Burgess S; Small DS; Thompson SG
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2333-2355. PubMed ID: 26282889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mendelian randomization analyses in ocular disease: a powerful approach to causal inference with human genetic data.
Li J; Li C; Huang Y; Guan P; Huang D; Yu H; Yang X; Liu L
J Transl Med; 2022 Dec; 20(1):621. PubMed ID: 36572895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mendelian randomization: use of genetics to enable causal inference in observational studies.
Verduijn M; Siegerink B; Jager KJ; Zoccali C; Dekker FW
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2010 May; 25(5):1394-8. PubMed ID: 20190244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mendelian Randomization in Cardiovascular Research: Establishing Causality When There Are Unmeasured Confounders.
Bell KJL; Loy C; Cust AE; Teixeira-Pinto A
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2021 Jan; 14(1):e005623. PubMed ID: 33397121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Eur J Epidemiol; 2017 May; 32(5):377-389. PubMed ID: 28527048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects.
Burgess S; Thompson SG
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 181(4):251-60. PubMed ID: 25632051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
Didelez V; Sheehan N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.
Liu Z; Ye T; Sun B; Schooling M; Tchetgen ET
Biometrics; 2023 Sep; 79(3):2208-2219. PubMed ID: 35950778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Constrained instruments and their application to Mendelian randomization with pleiotropy.
Jiang L; Oualkacha K; Didelez V; Ciampi A; Rosa-Neto P; Benedet AL; Mathotaarachchi S; Richards JB; Greenwood CMT;
Genet Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 43(4):373-401. PubMed ID: 30635941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
