These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32868029)

  • 1. Vertical marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated with one direct and three indirect digital scanning techniques.
    Akhlaghian M; Khaledi AA; Farzin M; Pardis S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 32868029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit zirconia frameworks fabricated with CAD-CAM technology using direct and indirect digital scans.
    Arezoobakhsh A; Shayegh SS; Jamali Ghomi A; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30982618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal fit of zirconia copings fabricated after conventional impression making and digital scanning: An in vitro study.
    Carrilho Baltazar Vaz IM; Pimentel Coelho Lino Carracho JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):223.e1-223.e6. PubMed ID: 32336539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the marginal fit of zirconia copings with digital impressions with an intraoral digital scanner.
    An S; Kim S; Choi H; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1171-5. PubMed ID: 24951386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of marginal fit of cemented zirconia copings manufactured after digital impression with lava™ C.O.S and conventional impression technique.
    Dauti R; Cvikl B; Franz A; Schwarze UY; Lilaj B; Rybaczek T; Moritz A
    BMC Oral Health; 2016 Dec; 16(1):129. PubMed ID: 27931256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo.
    Bosniac P; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2421-2427. PubMed ID: 30298453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal Accuracy of Monolithic and Veneered Zirconia Crowns Fabricated by Conventional and Digital Workflows.
    Abduo J; Ho G; Centorame A; Chohan S; Park C; Abdouni R; Le P; Ngo C
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Oct; 32(8):706-713. PubMed ID: 36321644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings.
    Kocaağaoğlu H; Kılınç HI; Albayrak H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 27622786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia.
    Bae SY; Park JY; Jeong ID; Kim HY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):106-112. PubMed ID: 27484816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods.
    Pedroche LO; Bernardes SR; Leão MP; Kintopp CC; Correr GM; Ornaghi BP; Gonzaga CC
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e113. PubMed ID: 27737366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal gap of monolithic zirconia endocrowns fabricated by using digital scanning and conventional impressions.
    Falahchai M; Babaee Hemmati Y; Neshandar Asli H; Emadi I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):325.e1-325.e5. PubMed ID: 33190865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different fabrication techniques on the marginal precision of polyetheretherketone single-crown copings.
    Attia MA; Shokry TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):565.e1-565.e7. PubMed ID: 32636071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An In Vitro Comparison of the Marginal Adaptation Accuracy of CAD/CAM Restorations Using Different Impression Systems.
    Shembesh M; Ali A; Finkelman M; Weber HP; Zandparsa R
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):581-586. PubMed ID: 26855068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Fit Between Zirconia and Metal Copings Fabricated Conventionally or Using Different CAD/CAM Techniques.
    Keramari N; Hems EPT; Weisbloom M; Sambrook RJ; Petridis H
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Aug; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 33508181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.