368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32868222)
1. How Often Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal Ultrasound?
Herlemann A; Overland MR; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 32868222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Versus Systematic Prostate Biopsies: 2-year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial (PRECISE).
Klotz L; Chin J; Black PC; Finelli A; Anidjar M; Machado A; Levental M; Ghai S; Chang SD; Patel C; Kassam Z; Loblaw A; Kebabdjian M; Pond G; Haider MA
Eur Urol Oncol; 2024 Jun; 7(3):456-461. PubMed ID: 37838556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Kajtazovic A; Lodeizen OAP; Gayet M; Engelbrecht MRW; Jager GJ; Wijkstra H; de Reijke TM; Beerlage HP
Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 37(5):298.e1-298.e9. PubMed ID: 30660493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores to Select an Optimal Prostate Biopsy Method: A Secondary Analysis of the Trio Study.
Ahdoot M; Lebastchi AH; Long L; Wilbur AR; Gomella PT; Mehralivand S; Daneshvar MA; Yerram NK; O'Connor LP; Wang AZ; Gurram S; Bloom J; Siddiqui MM; Linehan WM; Merino M; Choyke PL; Pinsky P; Parnes H; Shih JH; Turkbey B; Wood BJ; Pinto PA;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Apr; 5(2):176-186. PubMed ID: 33846112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Diagnostic efficacy of prostate cancer using targeted biopsy with 6-core systematic biopsy for patients with PI-RADS 5].
Liu Y; Yuan CW; Wu JY; Shen Q; Xiao JX; Zhao Z; Wang XY; Li XS; He ZS; Zhou LQ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Oct; 55(5):812-817. PubMed ID: 37807733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the optimal strategy in men with a single unilateral suspicious lesion on MRI undergoing transperineal MRI/ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy.
Yusim I; Mazor E; Frumkin E; Jabareen M; Hefer B; Elsaraya N; Li S; Rouvinov K; Novack V; Mabjeesh NJ
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(13):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 37263774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Cancer Detection Rates Between Template Systematic Biopsies Obtained Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Machine and Freehand Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsies.
Hoge C; Maynor S; Guan T; Naffouje R; Rao M; Verma S; Sidana A
J Endourol; 2020 Oct; 34(10):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 32631097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Clinical Value of Positive Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Young Men with a Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Soligo M; De Cobelli F; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Esposito A; Brembilla G; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):594-600. PubMed ID: 31204312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
