These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32868423)

  • 1. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
    Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence-accuracy resolution in the misinformation paradigm is influenced by the availability of source cues.
    Horry R; Colton LM; Williamson P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():164-73. PubMed ID: 24983514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.
    Bulevich JB; Gordon LT; Hughes GI; Thomas AK
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 34997479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.
    Greene CM; Bradshaw R; Huston C; Murphy G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 34110859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating suggestibility to additive and contradictory misinformation following explicit error detection in younger and older adults.
    Huff MJ; Umanath S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2018 Jun; 24(2):180-195. PubMed ID: 28816469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Witnesses' susceptibility to misleading post-event information delivered in a social media-style video.
    Sharman SJ; Danby MC; Gray AD
    Memory; 2024; 32(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 38146968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering.
    Blank H; Ost J; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):635-41. PubMed ID: 24184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Warning weakens retrieval-enhanced suggestibility only when it is given shortly after misinformation: The critical importance of timing.
    Chan JCK; O'Donnell R; Manley KD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):694-716. PubMed ID: 34990152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do distress responses to a traumatic film predict susceptibility to the misinformation effect?
    Monds LA; Paterson HM; Kemp RI; Bryant RA
    J Trauma Dissociation; 2013; 14(5):562-75. PubMed ID: 24060037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of false memory over time: is memory for misinformation "remembered" or "known"?
    Frost P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):531-6. PubMed ID: 11082861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of calibration for reconstructed eye-witness memories.
    Bonham AJ; González-Vallejo C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):34-52. PubMed ID: 19362279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transformed Neural Pattern Reinstatement during Episodic Memory Retrieval.
    Xiao X; Dong Q; Gao J; Men W; Poldrack RA; Xue G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(11):2986-2998. PubMed ID: 28202612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alcohol-induced retrograde facilitation renders witnesses of crime less suggestible to misinformation.
    Gawrylowicz J; Ridley AM; Albery IP; Barnoth E; Young J
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2017 Apr; 234(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 28214996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing increases suggestibility for narrative-based misinformation but reduces suggestibility for question-based misinformation.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JC
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):593-606. PubMed ID: 24105926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Protective effects of testing across misinformation formats in the household scene paradigm.
    Pereverseff RS; Bodner GE; Huff MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):425-441. PubMed ID: 31561745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.