These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32869123)

  • 1. Effect of CT imaging on the accuracy of the finite element modelling in bone.
    Benca E; Amini M; Pahr DH
    Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Sep; 4(1):51. PubMed ID: 32869123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constructing anisotropic finite element model of bone from computed tomography (CT).
    Kazembakhshi S; Luo Y
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2619-26. PubMed ID: 25226965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
    Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
    Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness.
    Giambini H; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nassr A; Yaszemski MJ; Zhao C
    J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910031-7. PubMed ID: 27428281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of in situ/in vitro three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography image voxel size on the finite element model of human vertebral cancellous bone.
    Lu Y; Engelke K; Glueer CC; Morlock MM; Huber G
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Nov; 228(11):1208-13. PubMed ID: 25500865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach for assigning bone material properties from CT images into finite element models.
    Chen G; Schmutz B; Epari D; Rathnayaka K; Ibrahim S; Schuetz MA; Pearcy MJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 19942221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
    Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements.
    Taddei F; Schileo E; Helgason B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 Nov; 29(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 17169598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three dimensional stereolithography models of cancellous bone structures from muCT data: testing and validation of finite element results.
    Dobson CA; Sisias G; Phillips R; Fagan MJ; Langton CM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Apr; 220(3):481-4. PubMed ID: 16808081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predicting Trabecular Bone Stiffness from Clinical Cone-Beam CT and HR-pQCT Data; an In Vitro Study Using Finite Element Analysis.
    Klintström E; Klintström B; Moreno R; Brismar TB; Pahr DH; Smedby Ö
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161101. PubMed ID: 27513664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skeletal assessment with finite element analysis: relevance, pitfalls and interpretation.
    Campbell GM; Glüer CC
    Curr Opin Rheumatol; 2017 Jul; 29(4):402-409. PubMed ID: 28376059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Harmonizing finite element modelling for non-invasive strength estimation by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
    Whittier DE; Manske SL; Kiel DP; Bouxsein M; Boyd SK
    J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 80():63-71. PubMed ID: 30201250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite-element modeling of bones from CT data: sensitivity to geometry and material uncertainties.
    Taddei F; Martelli S; Reggiani B; Cristofolini L; Viceconti M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Nov; 53(11):2194-200. PubMed ID: 17073324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.
    Anderson AE; Peters CL; Tuttle BD; Weiss JA
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Jun; 127(3):364-73. PubMed ID: 16060343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of dose reduction on bone strength prediction using finite element analysis.
    Anitha D; Subburaj K; Mei K; Kopp FK; Foehr P; Noel PB; Kirschke JS; Baum T
    Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():38441. PubMed ID: 27934902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new cortical thickness mapping method with application to an in vivo finite element model.
    Kim YH; Kim JE; Eberhardt AW
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(9):997-1001. PubMed ID: 23113651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical bone mapping improves finite element strain prediction accuracy at the proximal femur.
    Schileo E; Pitocchi J; Falcinelli C; Taddei F
    Bone; 2020 Jul; 136():115348. PubMed ID: 32240847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting bone strength from CT data: Clinical applications.
    Viceconti M
    Morphologie; 2019 Dec; 103(343):180-186. PubMed ID: 31630964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical finite element model for bone shape and biomechanical properties.
    Belenguer Querol L; Büchler P; Rueckert D; Nolte LP; González Ballester MA
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):405-11. PubMed ID: 17354916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Representation of bone heterogeneity in subject-specific finite element models for knee.
    Au AG; Liggins AB; Raso VJ; Carey J; Amirfazli A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Aug; 99(2):154-71. PubMed ID: 20022400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.