421 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32869150)
1. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.
Kim H; Kim JK; Hong SK; Jeong CW; Ku JH; Kwak C
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 32869150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy.
De Luca S; Fiori C; Bollito E; Garrou D; Aimar R; Cattaneo G; De Cillis S; Manfredi M; Tota D; Federica M; Passera R; Porpiglia F
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Jun; 72(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 31619029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of relationships between the final Gleason score, PI-RADS v2 score, ADC value, PSA level, and tumor diameter in patients that underwent radical prostatectomy due to prostate cancer.
Gündoğdu E; Emekli E; Kebapçı M
Radiol Med; 2020 Sep; 125(9):827-837. PubMed ID: 32266690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinically predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in patients after radical prostatectomy].
Zuo Q; Zhang F; Huang Y; Ma LL; Lu M; Lu J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Aug; 48(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29263497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. PI-RADS version 2 for prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy: a preliminary study in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason Score 7 (3+4) prostate cancer.
Woo S; Kim SY; Lee J; Kim SH; Cho JY
Eur Radiol; 2016 Oct; 26(10):3580-7. PubMed ID: 26847042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging With PI-RADS, Version 2, in Patients With Prostate Cancer Eligible for Active Surveillance: Which Radiologic Characteristics Can Predict Unfavorable Disease?
Kim H; Pak S; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK; Kim M; You D; Jeong IG; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Feb; 18(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 31640913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.
Kam J; Yuminaga Y; Krelle M; Gavin D; Koschel S; Aluwihare K; Sutherland T; Skinner S; Brennan J; Wong LM; Louie-Johnsun M
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 30714285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging finding does not guarantee the absence of significant cancer among biopsy-proven prostate cancer patients: a real-life clinical experience.
Kim JJ; Byun SS; Lee SE; Lee HJ; Choe G; Hong SK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2018 Nov; 50(11):1989-1997. PubMed ID: 30229465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gleason Score within Prostate Abnormal Areas Defined by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Vary According to the PIRADS Score.
Slaoui H; Neuzillet Y; Ghoneim T; Rouanne M; Abdou A; Lugagne-Delpon PM; Scherrer A; Radulescu C; Delancourt C; Molinié V; Lebret T
Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 28391284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age and gleason score upgrading between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy: Is this still true in the multiparametric resonance imaging era?
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Barletta F; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Brembilla G; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Guccini I; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):784.e1-784.e9. PubMed ID: 33865687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
