These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32869190)

  • 1. The role of metacognition in recognition of the content of statistical learning.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):333-340. PubMed ID: 32869190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiology of statistical learning: Exploring the online learning process and offline learning product.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Soto D; Molinaro N
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 May; 51(9):2008-2022. PubMed ID: 31872926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural bases of learning and recognition of statistical regularities.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Soto D
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2020 May; 1467(1):60-76. PubMed ID: 31919870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metacognitive processing in language learning tasks is affected by bilingualism.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Soto D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):529-538. PubMed ID: 31282726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consciousness influences the enhancement of visual statistical learning in Zipfian distributions.
    Otsuka S; Miura Y; Saiki J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jun; 50(6):889-901. PubMed ID: 37883051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing metacognition during or after basic-level and high-level cognitive tasks? A comparative study in a non-clinical sample.
    Quiles C; Prouteau A; Verdoux H
    Encephale; 2020 Feb; 46(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 31227210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive mechanisms of statistical learning and segmentation of continuous sensory input.
    Polyanskaya L
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):979-996. PubMed ID: 34964955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a G factor for metacognition? Correlations in retrospective metacognitive sensitivity across tasks.
    Mazancieux A; Fleming SM; Souchay C; Moulin CJA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Sep; 149(9):1788-1799. PubMed ID: 32191079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble coding of memory strength in recognition tests.
    Dubé C; Tong K; Westfall H; Bauer E
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):936-953. PubMed ID: 30919277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrete-state versus continuous models of the confidence-accuracy relationship in recognition memory.
    Delay CG; Wixted JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 33111256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional differences between statistical learning with and without explicit training.
    Batterink LJ; Reber PJ; Paller KA
    Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 22(11):544-56. PubMed ID: 26472644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paranoia is associated with impaired novelty detection and overconfidence in recognition memory judgments.
    Koller WN; Cannon TD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2021 Apr; 130(3):273-285. PubMed ID: 33492156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Domain-specific and domain-general processes underlying metacognitive judgments.
    Fitzgerald LM; Arvaneh M; Dockree PM
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():264-277. PubMed ID: 28222381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explicitly versus implicitly driven temporal expectations: No evidence for altered perceptual processing due to top-down modulations.
    Ball F; Groth RM; Agostino CS; Porcu E; Noesselt T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1793-1807. PubMed ID: 31875312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metacognitive knowledge and experience in recently diagnosed patients with bipolar disorder.
    Torres IJ; Mackala SA; Kozicky JM; Yatham LN
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Sep; 38(7):730-44. PubMed ID: 27144722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional responses to stimuli associated with a reward can occur in the absence of knowledge of their predictive values.
    Leganes-Fonteneau M; Scott R; Duka T
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 341():26-36. PubMed ID: 29247750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in the detail: Metacognition is better for seen than sensed changes to visual scenes.
    Salzman KD; Allen K; McAnally K
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Jul; 112():103533. PubMed ID: 37263078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and rejection.
    Papesh MH; Hicks JL; Guevara Pinto JD
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2328-2341. PubMed ID: 30808272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.