142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32870781)
1. Do CNNs Solve the CT Inverse Problem?
Sidky EY; Lorente I; Brankov JG; Pan X
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Jun; 68(6):1799-1810. PubMed ID: 32870781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Report on the AAPM deep-learning sparse-view CT grand challenge.
Sidky EY; Pan X
Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):4935-4943. PubMed ID: 35083750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks with a Deeper U-Net for Sparse-View Computed Tomography Reconstruction.
Nakai H; Nishio M; Yamashita R; Ono A; Nakao KK; Fujimoto K; Togashi K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Apr; 27(4):563-574. PubMed ID: 31281082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dual-domain neural network based on sinogram synthesis for sparse-view CT reconstruction.
Zhang P; Li K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Nov; 226():107168. PubMed ID: 36219892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CNN-Based Projected Gradient Descent for Consistent CT Image Reconstruction.
Gupta H; Jin KH; Nguyen HQ; McCann MT; Unser M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1440-1453. PubMed ID: 29870372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MDST: multi-domain sparse-view CT reconstruction based on convolution and swin transformer.
Li Y; Sun X; Wang S; Li X; Qin Y; Pan J; Chen P
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 36889004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Convolutional neural network-based metal and streak artifacts reduction in dental CT images with sparse-view sampling scheme.
Kim S; Ahn J; Kim B; Kim C; Baek J
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6253-6277. PubMed ID: 35906986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. End-to-end deep learning for interior tomography with low-dose x-ray CT.
Han Y; Wu D; Kim K; Li Q
Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(11):. PubMed ID: 35390782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. LRR-CED: low-resolution reconstruction-aware convolutional encoder-decoder network for direct sparse-view CT image reconstruction.
Kandarpa VSS; Perelli A; Bousse A; Visvikis D
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(15):. PubMed ID: 35738249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Computationally efficient deep neural network for computed tomography image reconstruction.
Wu D; Kim K; Li Q
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4763-4776. PubMed ID: 31132144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sparse-view CT reconstruction based on multi-level wavelet convolution neural network.
Lee M; Kim H; Kim HJ
Phys Med; 2020 Dec; 80():352-362. PubMed ID: 33279829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accurate and robust sparse-view angle CT image reconstruction using deep learning and prior image constrained compressed sensing (DL-PICCS).
Zhang C; Li Y; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5765-5781. PubMed ID: 34458996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A streak artifact reduction algorithm in sparse-view CT using a self-supervised neural representation.
Kim B; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7497-7515. PubMed ID: 35880806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging.
Fu J; Yang Y; Singhrao K; Ruan D; Chu FI; Low DA; Lewis JH
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 31220353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A TV-minimization image-reconstruction algorithm without system matrix.
Qiao Z; Lu Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(5):851-865. PubMed ID: 34308898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-dose CT denoising via convolutional neural network with an observer loss function.
Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5727-5742. PubMed ID: 34387360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning low-dose CT degradation from unpaired data with flow-based model.
Liu X; Liang X; Deng L; Tan S; Xie Y
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7516-7530. PubMed ID: 35880375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sparse-view CT image restoration
Wei Z; Wang Y; Tao X; Jia X; Bian Z; Chen G; Li M; Ma K; Li B; Ma J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2019 Nov; 39(11):1320-1328. PubMed ID: 31852651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks.
Ibragimov B; Xing L
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):547-557. PubMed ID: 28205307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
