589 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32871327)
21. Quantitative Coronary Angiography vs Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lee PH; Hong SJ; Kim HS; Yoon YW; Lee JY; Oh SJ; Lee JS; Kang SJ; Kim YH; Park SW; Lee SW; Lee CW;
JAMA Cardiol; 2024 May; 9(5):428-435. PubMed ID: 38477913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Kubo T; Shinke T; Okamura T; Hibi K; Nakazawa G; Morino Y; Shite J; Fusazaki T; Otake H; Kozuma K; Akasaka T
J Cardiol; 2016 Nov; 68(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 26763605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019.
Machanahalli Balakrishna A; Ismayl M; Walters RW; Aboeata A; Gowda RM; Vallabhajosyula S; Goldsweig AM; Dahal K
Curr Probl Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 47(9):101270. PubMed ID: 35640848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Otake H; Kubo T; Shinke T; Hibi K; Tanaka S; Ishida M; Kataoka T; Takaya T; Iwasaki M; Sonoda S; Ioji T; Akasaka T
J Cardiol; 2020 Sep; 76(3):317-321. PubMed ID: 32340781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Evidence and Clinical Trials.
Otake H
Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 36922063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ashraf DA; Ahmed U; Khan ZZ; Mushtaq F; Bano S; Khan AR; Azam S; Haroon A; Malik SA; Aslam R; Kumar J; Khan FZ; Faheem A; Kumar S; Hassan S
Future Cardiol; 2024; 20(3):137-150. PubMed ID: 38623957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Determinants of slow flow following stent implantation in intravascular ultrasound-guided primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Watanabe Y; Sakakura K; Taniguchi Y; Yamamoto K; Wada H; Fujita H; Momomura SI
Heart Vessels; 2018 Mar; 33(3):226-238. PubMed ID: 28887713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared with other imaging guidance: a meta-analysis.
Kuku KO; Ekanem E; Azizi V; Melaku G; Bui A; Meirovich YF; Dheendsa A; Beyene S; Hideo-Kajita A; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 29151138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Bavishi C; Sardar P; Chatterjee S; Khan AR; Shah A; Ather S; Lemos PA; Moreno P; Stone GW
Am Heart J; 2017 Mar; 185():26-34. PubMed ID: 28267472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Practical Application.
Ali ZA; Karimi Galougahi K; Thomas SV; Abu-Much A; Chau K; Dakroub A; Shlofmitz ES; Jeremias A; West N; Matsumura M; Mintz GS; Maehara A; Shlofmitz RA
Interv Cardiol Clin; 2023 Apr; 12(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 36922062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term clinical outcomes of image-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.
Kwon Y; Kim N; Kim CY; Kim DH; Shin H; Jung MS; Park JS; Park YJ; Park BE; Kim HN; Jang SY; Bae MH; Lee JH; Yang DH; Park HS; Cho Y; Cha KS; Hur SH; Hwang JY; Jeong MH;
PLoS One; 2024; 19(6):e0304843. PubMed ID: 38838047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optical coherence tomography, intravascular ultrasound or angiography guidance for distal left main coronary stenting. The ROCK cohort II study.
Cortese B; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Lanocha M; Ielasi A; Giannini F; Campo G; D'Ascenzo F; Latini RA; Krestianinov O; Alfonso F; Trani C; Prati F; Linares JA; Sardella G; Wlodarczak A; Viganò E; Camarero TG; Stella P; Sozykin A; Fineschi M; Burzotta F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Feb; 99(3):664-673. PubMed ID: 34582631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Optical Coherence Tomography to Optimize Results of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Results of the Multicenter, Randomized DOCTORS Study (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting).
Meneveau N; Souteyrand G; Motreff P; Caussin C; Amabile N; Ohlmann P; Morel O; Lefrançois Y; Descotes-Genon V; Silvain J; Braik N; Chopard R; Chatot M; Ecarnot F; Tauzin H; Van Belle E; Belle L; Schiele F
Circulation; 2016 Sep; 134(13):906-17. PubMed ID: 27573032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Role of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimizing Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Kim Y; Bae S; Johnson TW; Son NH; Sim DS; Hong YJ; Kim SW; Cho DK; Kim JS; Kim BK; Choi D; Hong MK; Jang Y; Jeong MH;
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Mar; 11(5):e023481. PubMed ID: 35179041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical utility and significance of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in guiding percutaneous coronary interventions.
Hibi K; Kimura K; Umemura S
Circ J; 2015; 79(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 25744628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optical coherence tomography is a kid on the block: I would choose intravascular ultrasound.
Dash D
Indian Heart J; 2017; 69(3):407-410. PubMed ID: 28648442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Imaging-guided PCI for event suppression in Japanese acute coronary syndrome patients: community-based observational cohort registry.
Yamashita T; Sakamoto K; Tabata N; Ishii M; Sato R; Nagamatsu S; Motozato K; Yamanaga K; Sueta D; Araki S; Arima Y; Yamamoto E; Takashio S; Fujisue K; Fujimoto K; Shimomura H; Tsunoda R; Maruyama H; Nakamura N; Sakaino N; Nakamura S; Yamamoto N; Matsumura T; Kajiwara I; Tayama S; Sakamoto T; Nakao K; Oshima S; Kaikita K; Hokimoto S; Tsujita K;
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2021 Jan; 36(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 32052349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
