BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

915 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32871566)

  • 21. Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Alvi MA; Kurian SJ; Wahood W; Goyal A; Elder BD; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jul; 127():596-606.e1. PubMed ID: 30954733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correction of severe spinopelvic mismatch: decreased blood loss with lateral hyperlordotic interbody grafts as compared with pedicle subtraction osteotomy.
    Leveque JC; Yanamadala V; Buchlak QD; Sethi RK
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E15. PubMed ID: 28760028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.
    Robertson PA; Armstrong WA; Woods DL; Rawlinson JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1350-E1357. PubMed ID: 30383726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of steerable cage placement during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on lumbar lordosis.
    Lindley TE; Viljoen SV; Dahdaleh NS
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Mar; 21(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 24207010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Saadeh YS; Joseph JR; Smith BW; Kirsch MJ; Sabbagh AM; Park P
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1374-e1378. PubMed ID: 30902780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does Lordotic Angle of Cage Determine Lumbar Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Hong TH; Cho KJ; Kim YT; Park JW; Seo BH; Kim NC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jul; 42(13):E775-E780. PubMed ID: 27779605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What Affects Segmental Lordosis of the Surgical Site after Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Kim SH; Hahn BS; Park JY
    Yonsei Med J; 2022 Jul; 63(7):665-674. PubMed ID: 35748078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of Spino-Pelvic Parameters and Segmental Lordosis with L5-S1 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at the Bottom of a Long Construct in Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Anand N; Alayan A; Agrawal A; Kahwaty S; Nomoto E; Khandehroo B
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e1077-e1083. PubMed ID: 31323412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.
    Leveque JA; Drolet CE; Nemani V; Krause KL; Shen J; Rathore A; Baig Y; Louie PK
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e311-e317. PubMed ID: 35490888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical Consideration for TLIF Cage Retrieval and Deformity Correction With Anterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Revision Surgeries.
    Janjua MB; Ackshota N; Arlet V
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):633-640. PubMed ID: 31202382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preservation or Restoration of Segmental and Regional Spinal Lordosis Using Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion Techniques in Degenerative Lumbar Conditions: A Literature Review.
    Uribe JS; Myhre SL; Youssef JA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr; 41 Suppl 8():S50-8. PubMed ID: 26825789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Functional and radiological outcome of anterior retroperitoneal versus posterior transforaminal interbody fusion in the management of single-level lumbar degenerative disease.
    Bassani R; Morselli C; Querenghi AM; Nuara A; Sconfienza LM; Peretti GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E2. PubMed ID: 32871567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.
    Strong MJ; Yee TJ; Khalsa SSS; Saadeh YS; Swong KN; Kashlan ON; Szerlip NJ; Park P; Oppenlander ME
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E4. PubMed ID: 32871568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of Cage Design on Radiological and Clinical Outcomes in Dorsal Lumbar Spinal Fusions: A Comparison of Lordotic and Non-Lordotic Cages.
    Walter C; Baumgärtner T; Trappe D; Frantz S; Exner L; Mederake M
    Orthop Surg; 2021 May; 13(3):863-875. PubMed ID: 33763988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Expandable vs Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic Comparison of Segmental and Lumbar Sagittal Angles.
    Yee TJ; Joseph JR; Terman SW; Park P
    Neurosurgery; 2017 Jul; 81(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 28368542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion induce lordosis or kyphosis? Radiographic evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Liu J; Duan P; Mummaneni PV; Xie R; Li B; Dong Y; Berven S; Chou D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Jul; 35(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 34243159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Analysis of lumbosacral sagittal balance parameter variation in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with real-time 3D navigation techniques].
    Ma CR; Chen HX; Li GJ; He XY; Wang LS; Huang T; Meng ZB
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2021 Apr; 34(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 33896128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.