These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32871573)

  • 1. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of cage subsidence in standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: novel 3D-printed titanium versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage.
    Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Zhu J; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2377-2384. PubMed ID: 34215921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Poor Bone Quality, Multilevel Surgery, and Narrow and Tall Cages Are Associated with Intraoperative Endplate Injuries and Late-onset Cage Subsidence in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review.
    Wu H; Shan Z; Zhao F; Cheung JPY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):163-188. PubMed ID: 34324459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Graft subsidence and reoperation after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched and cost analysis of polyetheretherketone versus 3D-printed porous titanium interbodies.
    Alan N; Deng H; Muthiah N; Vodovotz L; Dembinski R; Guha D; Agarwal N; Ozpinar A; Hamilton DK; Kanter AS; Okonkwo DO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):187-195. PubMed ID: 37178027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early Outcomes of Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium versus Polyetheretherketone Cage Implantation for Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Degeneration.
    Adl Amini D; Moser M; Oezel L; Zhu J; Okano I; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e14-e20. PubMed ID: 34863938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.
    Marchi L; Abdala N; Oliveira L; Amaral R; Coutinho E; Pimenta L
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jul; 19(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 23662890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.
    Deng Z; Zou Q; Wang L; Wang L; Xiu P; Feng G; Song Y; Yang X
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Nov; 15(11):2889-2900. PubMed ID: 37771127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Titanium-coated PEEK Cage Maintains Better Bone Fusion With the Endplate Than the PEEK Cage 6 Months After PLIF Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Study.
    Hasegawa T; Ushirozako H; Shigeto E; Ohba T; Oba H; Mukaiyama K; Shimizu S; Yamato Y; Ide K; Shibata Y; Ojima T; Takahashi J; Haro H; Matsuyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Aug; 45(15):E892-E902. PubMed ID: 32675599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Zhu H; Zhong W; Zhang P; Liu X; Huang J; Liu F; Li J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jun; 21(1):379. PubMed ID: 32534573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison in the same intervertebral space between titanium-coated and uncoated PEEK cages in lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
    Kashii M; Kitaguchi K; Makino T; Kaito T
    J Orthop Sci; 2020 Jul; 25(4):565-570. PubMed ID: 31375363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of polyetheretherketone cages with femoral cortical bone allograft as a single-piece interbody spacer in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Cutler AR; Siddiqui S; Mohan AL; Hillard VH; Cerabona F; Das K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Dec; 5(6):534-9. PubMed ID: 17176018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promotion of higher rates of early fusion using activated titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in adults undergoing 1- and 2-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a randomized controlled trial.
    Toop N; Dhaliwal J; Gifford CS; Gibbs D; Keister A; Miracle S; Forghani R; Grossbach AJ; Farhadi HF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Nov; 39(5):709-718. PubMed ID: 37542447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PEEK Versus Titanium Static Interbody Cages: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for 1-Level TLIFs.
    Canseco JA; Karamian BA; Patel PD; Divi SN; Timmons T; Hallman H; Nachwalter R; Lee JK; Kurd MF; Anderson DG; Rihn JA; Hilibrand AS; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; Schroeder GD
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Oct; 34(8):E483-E493. PubMed ID: 34369911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of a Unilateral Bridging Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Year Clinical Results and Fusion Rate with a Focus on Subsidence.
    Heinz von der Hoeh N; Villa T; Galbusera F; Voelker A; Spiegl UA; Jarvers JS; Heyde CE
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e308-e314. PubMed ID: 29738859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.
    Sakaura H; Ikegami D; Fujimori T; Sugiura T; Yamada S; Mukai Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct; 209():106945. PubMed ID: 34555798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of interbody fusion cages used in 1 and 2-levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: titanium cages versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages.
    Niu CC; Liao JC; Chen WJ; Chen LH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jul; 23(5):310-6. PubMed ID: 20124907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.
    Nemoto O; Asazuma T; Yato Y; Imabayashi H; Yasuoka H; Fujikawa A
    Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2150-5. PubMed ID: 25015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.
    Tan JH; Cheong CK; Hey HWD
    Eur Spine J; 2021 May; 30(5):1285-1295. PubMed ID: 33555365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.