These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3287255)

  • 1. Morphologic replication of the mandible using computerized tomography for the fabrication of a subperiosteal implant.
    Truitt HP; James RA; Lindley PE; Boyne P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 May; 65(5):499-504. PubMed ID: 3287255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term retrospective studies on the CT-scan, CAD/CAM, one-stage surgery hydroxyapatite-coated subperiosteal implants, including human functional retrievals.
    Benjamin LS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 36(1):77-93; discussion 94-5. PubMed ID: 1310663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CAD/CAM subperiosteal implants in Australia. Case report.
    Fischer JE
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Aug; 38(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 8110228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method for adapting existing removable complete dentures to immediate implants.
    Kim J; Lee JS; Chang J; Millstein P; Wright RF
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2011; 60(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 22128476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer tomography (CT) applications in implant dentistry.
    James RA; Lozada JL; Truitt HP
    J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1942127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of CT generated model with its mandibular and maxillary bone; 2: In vivo study utilizing rasterstereographic technique.
    Harris DD; Ismail YH; Misch C; Zaki HS
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1989; 6(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2519534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems associated with the atrophic mandible.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein JE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):129-60. PubMed ID: 9421674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advances in subperiosteal implant reconstruction.
    Boyne PJ; James RA
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Apr; 30(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 3009243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants.
    Golec TS
    Dent Clin North Am; 1986 Jan; 30(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 3456935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reconstruction of the edentulous mandible.
    Babbush CA
    Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):266-76. PubMed ID: 3912328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible.
    Casap N; Tarazi E; Wexler A; Sonnenfeld U; Lustmann J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 15747679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The tent pole splint: a bone-supported stereolithographic surgical splint for the soft tissue matrix expansion graft procedure.
    Cillo JE; Theodotou N; Samuels M; Krajekian J
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 68(6):1365-70. PubMed ID: 20231048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibility of mandibular inferior border grafts.
    Galey RK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1989 Jan; 47(1):2, 105. PubMed ID: 2642959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiologic-prosthetic planning of the surgical phase of the treatment of edentulism by osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study.
    Modica F; Fava C; Benech A; Preti G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):541-6. PubMed ID: 2066894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computerized tomography for implant treatment planning.
    Amet EM
    J Kans Dent Assoc; 1998; ():17-20. PubMed ID: 9800552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical incorporation of computed tomography into daily implant treatment planning.
    Caldwell CS
    Tex Dent J; 2005 Apr; 122(4):343-54. PubMed ID: 15984368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Complete mandibular subperiosteal implant fabricated from model generated from computer tomography data.
    James RA
    Implantologist; 1985; 3(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 3914447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A descriptive 18-year retrospective review of subperiosteal implants for patients with severely atrophied edentulous mandibles.
    Moore DJ; Hansen PA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 15295323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guides in edentulous mandibles.
    Ochi M; Kanazawa M; Sato D; Kasugai S; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
    Comput Biol Med; 2013 Nov; 43(11):1653-60. PubMed ID: 24209910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.