These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32872753)

  • 21. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reference values of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and characteristics of deterioration of QOL: Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Diagnosis Support Tool: DISTO project.
    Kobayashi H; Sekiguchi M; Yonemoto K; Kakuma T; Tominaga R; Kato K; Watanabe K; Nikaido T; Otani K; Yabuki S; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI;
    J Orthop Sci; 2019 Jul; 24(4):584-589. PubMed ID: 30616940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bowel/bladder dysfunction and numbness in the sole of the both feet in lumbar spinal stenosis - A multicenter cross-sectional study.
    Watanabe K; Sekiguchi M; Yonemoto K; Nikaido T; Kato K; Otani K; Yabuki S; Kakuma T; Kikuchi SI; Konno SI;
    J Orthop Sci; 2017 Jul; 22(4):647-651. PubMed ID: 28551282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of 2-year follow-up outcomes in lumbar spinal stenosis patients treated with physical therapy alone and those with surgical intervention after less successful physical therapy.
    Minetama M; Kawakami M; Nakagawa M; Ishimoto Y; Nagata K; Fukui D; Sumiya T; Kitagawa T; Miyake T; Yamamoto Y; Sakon N; Matsuoka T; Nakagawa Y
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 May; 23(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 29395806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative study of three conservative treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: lumbar spinal stenosis with acupuncture and physical therapy study (LAP study).
    Oka H; Matsudaira K; Takano Y; Kasuya D; Niiya M; Tonosu J; Fukushima M; Oshima Y; Fujii T; Tanaka S; Inanami H
    BMC Complement Altern Med; 2018 Jan; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 29351748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Five-year results of a clinical pilot study utilizing a pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):241-249. PubMed ID: 29856305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Normative data of a smartphone app-based 6-minute walking test, test-retest reliability, and content validity with patient-reported outcome measures.
    Tosic L; Goldberger E; Maldaner N; Sosnova M; Zeitlberger AM; Staartjes VE; Gadjradj PS; Eversdijk HAJ; Quddusi A; Gandía-González ML; Sayadi JJ; Desai A; Regli L; Gautschi OP; Stienen MN
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 May; 33(4):480-489. PubMed ID: 32470938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Difference in evaluation of patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score for Back Pain and the Japanese Version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
    Nakamura M; Miyamoto K; Shimizu K
    J Orthop Sci; 2009 Jul; 14(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19662468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study with 2-year follow-up to compare the performance of decompression with and without interlaminar stabilization.
    Schmidt S; Franke J; Rauschmann M; Adelt D; Bonsanto MM; Sola S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Apr; 28(4):406-415. PubMed ID: 29372860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Gender differences in the surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease: a scoping review.
    MacLean MA; Touchette CJ; Han JH; Christie SD; Pickett GE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Jun; 32(6):799-816. PubMed ID: 32005013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Twelve-month results of a clinical pilot study utilizing pedicle-lengthening osteotomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Mlyavykh S; Ludwig SC; Mobasser JP; Kepler CK; Anderson DG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 23373562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of Skeletal Muscle Mass and Spinal Alignment on Surgical Outcomes for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.
    Eguchi Y; Suzuki M; Yamanaka H; Tamai H; Kobayashi T; Orita S; Yamauchi K; Suzuki M; Inage K; Fujimoto K; Kanamoto H; Abe K; Norimoto M; Umimura T; Aoki Y; Koda M; Furuya T; Toyone T; Ozawa T; Takahashi K; Ohtori S
    Asian Spine J; 2018 Jun; 12(3):556-562. PubMed ID: 29879785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Classifying patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using painDETECT: a cross-sectional study.
    Takahashi N; Shirado O; Kobayashi K; Mashiko R; Konno S
    BMC Fam Pract; 2016 Jul; 17():90. PubMed ID: 27443164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level.
    Komatsu J; Muta T; Nagura N; Iwabuchi M; Fukuda H; Kaneko K; Shirado O
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preliminary Results of Relationship between Preoperative Walking Ability and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Morphology in Patients with Lumbar Canal Stenosis: Comparison between Trefoil and Triangle Types of Spinal Stenosis.
    Azimi P; Yazdanian T; Benzel EC
    Asian Spine J; 2017 Aug; 11(4):580-585. PubMed ID: 28874976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally clinically important differences for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) following decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Ogura Y; Ogura K; Kobayashi Y; Kitagawa T; Yonezawa Y; Takahashi Y; Yoshida K; Yasuda A; Shinozaki Y; Ogawa J
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 69():93-96. PubMed ID: 31416735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The sagittal spinal profile type: a principal precondition for surgical decision making in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Franke J; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Nov; 27(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 28862573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Elevated levels of phosphorylated neurofilament heavy subunit in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary findings.
    Ohya J; Chikuda H; Kato S; Hayakawa K; Oka H; Takeshita K; Tanaka S; Ogata T
    Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1587-92. PubMed ID: 25797810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.