These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32873011)

  • 1. Perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for accommodating gender-related talker differences heard by listeners with normal hearing and with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Moore AN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):496. PubMed ID: 32873011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic cue integration in speech intonation recognition with cochlear implants.
    Peng SC; Chatterjee M; Lu N
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Jun; 16(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 22790392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discriminability and Perceptual Saliency of Temporal and Spectral Cues for Final Fricative Consonant Voicing in Simulated Cochlear-Implant and Bimodal Hearing.
    Kong YY; Winn MB; Poellmann K; Donaldson GS
    Trends Hear; 2016 Jun; 20():. PubMed ID: 27317666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using speech sounds to test functional spectral resolution in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Winn MB; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1430-42. PubMed ID: 25786954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weighting of cues for fricative place of articulation perception by children wearing cochlear implants.
    Hedrick M; Bahng J; von Hapsburg D; Younger MS
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):540-7. PubMed ID: 21604957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptual Discrimination of Speaking Style Under Cochlear Implant Simulation.
    Tamati TN; Janse E; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 29742545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strategic perceptual weighting of acoustic cues for word stress in listeners with cochlear implants, acoustic hearing, or simulated bimodal hearing.
    Fleming JT; Winn MB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Sep; 152(3):1300. PubMed ID: 36182279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of fundamental frequency for lexical segmentation in listeners with cochlear implants.
    Spitzer S; Liss J; Spahr T; Dorman M; Lansford K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):EL236-41. PubMed ID: 19507928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word Learning in Deaf Adults Who Use Cochlear Implants: The Role of Talker Variability and Attention to the Mouth.
    Hartman J; Saffran J; Litovsky R
    Ear Hear; 2024 Mar-Apr 01; 45(2):337-350. PubMed ID: 37695563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender categorization is abnormal in cochlear implant users.
    Fuller CD; Gaudrain E; Clarke JN; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Free RH; Başkent D
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2014 Dec; 15(6):1037-48. PubMed ID: 25172111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of acoustic cues for phonetic identification: effects of spectral degradation and electric hearing.
    Winn MB; Chatterjee M; Idsardi WJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1465-79. PubMed ID: 22352517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.
    Zaltz Y; Goldsworthy RL; Eisenberg LS; Kishon-Rabin L
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Talker variability effects on vocal emotion recognition in acoustic and simulated electric hearing.
    Luo X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):EL497. PubMed ID: 28040001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do adults with cochlear implants rely on different acoustic cues for phoneme perception than adults with normal hearing?
    Moberly AC; Lowenstein JH; Tarr E; Caldwell-Tarr A; Welling DB; Shahin AJ; Nittrouer S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):566-82. PubMed ID: 24686722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.
    Bernstein JGW; Stakhovskaya OA; Jensen KK; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):747-761. PubMed ID: 31584504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.