These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32873021)

  • 1. Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.
    Jorgensen EJ; McCreery RW; Kirby BJ; Brennan M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):908. PubMed ID: 32873021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.
    Carter L; Dillon H; Seymour J; Seeto M; Van Dun B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Audibility and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination Thresholds as Predictors of Word Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression.
    Brennan MA; McCreery RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Oct; 32(9):596-605. PubMed ID: 35176803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory enhancement in younger and older listeners with normal and impaired hearinga).
    Kreft HA; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Dec; 154(6):3821-3832. PubMed ID: 38109406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectrotemporal Modulation Discrimination in Infants With Normal Hearing.
    Noble AR; Resnick J; Broncheau M; Klotz S; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA; Horn DL
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 36218270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Mehraei G; Shamma S; Gallun FJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Krishnan A; Bartlett E
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e91-e103. PubMed ID: 26583482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.
    Davies-Venn E; Nelson P; Souza P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Limiting spectral resolution in speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Turner CW; Chi SL; Flock S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):773-84. PubMed ID: 10450899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spectral shape discrimination by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Lentz JJ; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1604-16. PubMed ID: 12656395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Word-Recognition Performances on the Auditec and VA Recorded Versions of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing and by Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using a Randomized Presentation-Level Paradigm.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):370-395. PubMed ID: 30969910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Summers V; Leek MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3518-28. PubMed ID: 8046143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels.
    Kuk F; Lau CC; Korhonen P; Crose B
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive Abilities Contribute to Spectro-Temporal Discrimination in Children Who Are Hard of Hearing.
    Kirby BJ; Spratford M; Klein KE; McCreery RW
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):645-650. PubMed ID: 30130295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of presentation levels to maximize word recognition scores.
    Guthrie LA; Mackersie CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Jun; 20(6):381-90. PubMed ID: 19594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.
    Miller CW; Bernstein JGW; Zhang X; Wu YH; Bentler RA; Tremblay K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 61(12):3113-3126. PubMed ID: 30515519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.
    Isarangura S; Eddins AC; Ozmeral EJ; Eddins DA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3876-3886. PubMed ID: 31638883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
    Henry BA; Turner CW; Behrens A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1111-21. PubMed ID: 16158665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.