These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32873024)

  • 1. Effects of acoustic nonlinearity on pulse-echo attenuation coefficient estimation from tissue-mimicking phantoms.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):805. PubMed ID: 32873024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
    Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
    Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ultrasound attenuation measurements using a reference phantom with sound speed mismatch.
    Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Rubert NC; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    Ultrason Imaging; 2011 Oct; 33(4):251-63. PubMed ID: 22518955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Frequency-Dependent Attenuation on Predicted Histotripsy Waveforms in Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms.
    Bader KB; Crowe MJ; Raymond JL; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Jul; 42(7):1701-5. PubMed ID: 27108036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of Tissue Attenuation from Ultrasonic B-Mode Images-Spectral-Log-Difference and Method-of-Moments Algorithms Compared.
    Brandner DM; Cai X; Foiret J; Ferrara KW; Zagar BG
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Apr; 21(7):. PubMed ID: 33916496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic characterization of tissue-mimicking materials for ultrasound perfusion imaging research.
    Chen P; Pollet AMAO; Panfilova A; Zhou M; Turco S; den Toonder JMJ; Mischi M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):124-142. PubMed ID: 34654580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The acoustic properties, centered on 20 MHZ, of an IEC agar-based tissue-mimicking material and its temperature, frequency and age dependence.
    Brewin MP; Pike LC; Rowland DE; Birch MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1292-306. PubMed ID: 18343021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
    Coila A; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4196. PubMed ID: 35778186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Task-oriented comparison of power spectral density estimation methods for quantifying acoustic attenuation in diagnostic ultrasound using a reference phantom method.
    Rosado-Mendez IM; Nam K; Hall TJ; Zagzebski JA
    Ultrason Imaging; 2013 Jul; 35(3):214-34. PubMed ID: 23858055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tuning acoustic and mechanical properties of materials for ultrasound phantoms and smart substrates for cell cultures.
    Cafarelli A; Verbeni A; Poliziani A; Dario P; Menciassi A; Ricotti L
    Acta Biomater; 2017 Feb; 49():368-378. PubMed ID: 27884775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exposimetry system using tissue-mimicking liquid.
    Stiles TA; Madsen EL; Frank GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 34(1):123-36. PubMed ID: 17720296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency-dependent attenuation reconstruction with an acoustic reflector.
    Rau R; Unal O; Schweizer D; Vishnevskiy V; Goksel O
    Med Image Anal; 2021 Jan; 67():101875. PubMed ID: 33197864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ultrasound assessment of the conversion of sound energy into heat in tissue phantoms enriched with magnetic micro- and nanoparticles.
    Gambin B; Kruglenko E; Tymkiewicz R; Litniewski J
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4361-4370. PubMed ID: 31359439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic fat fraction quantification using in vivo adaptive sound speed estimation.
    Imbault M; Dioguardi Burgio M; Faccinetto A; Ronot M; Bendjador H; Deffieux T; Triquet EO; Rautou PE; Castera L; Gennisson JL; Vilgrain V; Tanter M
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215013. PubMed ID: 30362461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating acoustic and thermal properties of a plaque phantom.
    Sotiriou M; Damianou C
    J Ultrasound; 2024 Sep; 27(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 37031317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac Tissue-Mimicking Ballistic Gel Phantom for Ultrasound Imaging in Clinical and Research Applications.
    Alves N; Kim A; Tan J; Hwang G; Javed T; Neagu B; Courtney BK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Aug; 46(8):2057-2069. PubMed ID: 32430107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reference Phantom Method for Ultrasonic Imaging of Thin Dynamic Constructs.
    Ruland A; Hill JM; Wallace GG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2388-2403. PubMed ID: 34059374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.