These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Outcome of assisted reproduction in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a prospective observational study. Prior M; Richardson A; Asif S; Polanski L; Parris-Larkin M; Chandler J; Fogg L; Jassal P; Thornton JG; Raine-Fenning NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 29055072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No clinical relevance of the height of fundal indentation in subseptate or arcuate uterus: a prospective study. Gergolet M; Campo R; Verdenik I; Kenda Suster N; Gordts S; Gianaroli L Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 May; 24(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 22417666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ESHRE/ESGE female genital tract anomalies classification system-the potential impact of discarding arcuate uterus on clinical practice. Knez J; Saridogan E; Van Den Bosch T; Mavrelos D; Ambler G; Jurkovic D Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):600-606. PubMed ID: 29514262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems. Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Bhagavath B; Lindheim SR; Martins WP Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 54(6):800-814. PubMed ID: 30977223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of septate and bicornuate uterus compared with office hysteroscopy and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging. Faivre E; Fernandez H; Deffieux X; Gervaise A; Frydman R; Levaillant JM J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 22014544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Salim R; Woelfer B; Backos M; Regan L; Jurkovic D Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):578-82. PubMed ID: 12808675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the ESHRE-ESGE and ASRM classifications of Müllerian duct anomalies in everyday practice. Ludwin A; Ludwin I Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):569-80. PubMed ID: 25534461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical value of three-dimensional transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of septate uterus and prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome]. Liu M; Wang SS; Lin XW; He SH Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 48(7):499-503. PubMed ID: 24284219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Simple Method for Excluding Uterine Canalization Defects Using Two-Dimensional Ultrasound in Infertile Women. Pascual MA; Alcazar JL; Graupera B; Pedrero C; Fernandez-Cid M; Hereter L J Reprod Med; 2017; 62(3-4):133-7. PubMed ID: 30230304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of uterine anomalies and their impact on early pregnancy in women conceiving after assisted reproduction treatment. Jayaprakasan K; Chan YY; Sur S; Deb S; Clewes JS; Raine-Fenning NJ Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 21337662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cervix and vagina in women with uterine malformations. Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Recio M; Ruiz-López L; Díaz D; Illescas T Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 23754235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Proposal for Diagnostic Criteria of Y-Shaped Dysmorphic Uterus Based on 3-Dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound Measurements. Aslan B; Şükür YE; Özmen B; Sönmezer M; Berker B; Aytaç R; Atabekoğlu CS J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):504-510. PubMed ID: 38553000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two- and three-dimensional ultrasonography and sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy with laparoscopy in the differential diagnosis of septate, bicornuate, and arcuate uteri. Ludwin A; Pityński K; Ludwin I; Banas T; Knafel A J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23312248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of uterine anatomy and detection of congenital anomalies: a comparison with hysterosalpingography and two-dimensional sonography. Jurkovic D; Geipel A; Gruboeck K; Jauniaux E; Natucci M; Campbell S Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 5(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 7600203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis and the classification of congenital uterine anomalies using the ESHRE/ESGE classification: a diagnostic accuracy study. Kougioumtsidou A; Mikos T; Grimbizis GF; Karavida A; Theodoridis TD; Sotiriadis A; Tarlatzis BC; Athanasiadis AP Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Mar; 299(3):779-789. PubMed ID: 30661094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract. Graupera B; Pascual MA; Hereter L; Browne JL; Úbeda B; Rodríguez I; Pedrero C Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 46(5):616-22. PubMed ID: 25690307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relevance of Uterine Subseptations: What Length Should Warrant Hysteroscopic Resection? Detti L; Hickman H; Levi D'Ancona R; Wright AW; Christiansen ME J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Apr; 36(4):757-765. PubMed ID: 27943370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]