These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32873098)
21. Classification of Uterine Anomalies by 3-Dimensional Ultrasonography Using ESHRE/ESGE Criteria: Interobserver Variability. Bermejo C; Martínez-Ten P; Ruíz-López L; Estévez M; Gil MM Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 25(5):740-747. PubMed ID: 28847221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Woelfer B; Salim R; Banerjee S; Elson J; Regan L; Jurkovic D Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 98(6):1099-103. PubMed ID: 11755560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Ultrasound assessment of uterine cavity remodeling after surgical correction of subseptations. Detti L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 210(3):262.e1-6. PubMed ID: 24215853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnosing Septate Uterus Using Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Using Three Different Classifications: An Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Study. Peixoto C; Castro M; Carriles I; Arriba M; Lapresa V; Alcazar JL Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2021 Dec; 43(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 34933384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Bermejo C; Martínez Ten P; Cantarero R; Diaz D; Pérez Pedregosa J; Barrón E; Labrador E; Ruiz López L Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 20052665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Usefulness of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography in diagnosing uterine anomalies. Szkodziak P; Woźniak S; Czuczwar P; Paszkowski T; Milart P; Wozniakowska E; Szlichtyng W Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 25011216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for müllerian tract abnormalities. Letterie GS; Haggerty M; Lindee G Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1995; 40(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 7749433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysteroscopy in diagnosis of arcuate, septate and bicornuate uterus. Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Banas T; Knafel A; Miedzyblocki M; Basta A J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Mar; 37(3):178-86. PubMed ID: 21314802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of four systems for uterine septum diagnosis and indication for surgical correction. Detti L; Peregrin-Alvarez I; Roman RA; Levi D'Ancona R; Gordon JC; Christiansen ME Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):376-383. PubMed ID: 34008393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Restoration of Uterine Cavity Measurements after Surgical Correction. Detti L; Christiansen ME; Levi D'Ancona R; Gordon JC; Van de Velde N; Peregrin-Alvarez I J Imaging; 2020 Jun; 6(7):. PubMed ID: 34460651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Do measurements of uterine septum using three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging agree? Ata B; Nayot D; Nedelchev A; Reinhold C; Tulandi T J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Apr; 36(4):331-338. PubMed ID: 24798671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Avoiding the fatal misdiagnosis of pregnancy in a noncommunicating rudimentary horn using 3D transvaginal ultrasound. Walker C; Collins L; Pham A; George J; Johnson S J Clin Ultrasound; 2020 Nov; 48(9):553-556. PubMed ID: 32255499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of two dimensional and live three dimensional ultrasounds for the diagnosis of septated uterus. Niknejadi M; Akhbari F; Niknejad F; Khalili G; Shiva M Iran J Reprod Med; 2014 Aug; 12(8):547-54. PubMed ID: 25408704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Grimbizis GF; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saravelos SH; Gordts S; Exacoustos C; Van Schoubroeck D; Bermejo C; Amso NN; Nargund G; Timmerman D; Athanasiadis A; Brucker S; De Angelis C; Gergolet M; Li TC; Tanos V; Tarlatzis B; Farquharson R; Gianaroli L; Campo R Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 26537921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. What type of uterine anomalies had an additional effect on pregnancy outcomes, compared to other uterine anomalies? An evaluation of a large population database. Kadour Peero E; Badeghiesh A; Baghlaf H; Dahan MH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(26):10494-10501. PubMed ID: 36216352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Differentiating between septate and bicornuate uterus: bi-dimensional and 3-dimensional power Doppler findings. Nazzaro G; Locci M; Marilena M; Salzano E; Palmieri T; De Placido G J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(5):870-6. PubMed ID: 24727032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical length and quantitative fetal fibronectin in the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic women with congenital uterine anomaly. Ridout AE; Ibeto LA; Ross GN; Cook JR; Sykes L; David AL; Seed PT; Tribe RM; Bennett PR; Terzidou V; Shennan AH; Chandiramani M; ; Brown RG; Chatfield S; Sadeh D Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):341.e1-341.e9. PubMed ID: 31132343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy and American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification systems for congenital uterine anomalies detected using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Ludwin A; Ludwin I; Kudla M; Kottner J Fertil Steril; 2015 Sep; 104(3):688-97.e8. PubMed ID: 26158905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical significance of 3D ultrasound compared to MRI in uterine malformations. Imboden S; Müller M; Raio L; Mueller MD; Tutschek B Ultraschall Med; 2014 Oct; 35(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 24557634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Tomaževič T; Ban-Frangež H; Virant-Klun I; Verdenik I; Požlep B; Vrtačnik-Bokal E Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):700-5. PubMed ID: 20864409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]