102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32873440)
1. Catheter-based Arterial Input Function Determination for Myocardial Perfusion Measurements.
Stephan S; Reiss S; Lottner T; Özen AC; Bock M
Z Med Phys; 2021 Feb; 31(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 32873440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-stage automated local arterial input function selection in perfusion MRI.
Tabbara R; Connelly A; Calamante F
MAGMA; 2020 Jun; 33(3):357-365. PubMed ID: 31722036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of arterial input function (AIF) on quantitative prostate dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and zonal prostate anatomy.
Ziayee F; Müller-Lutz A; Gross J; Quentin M; Ullrich T; Heusch P; Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Wittsack HJ; Schimmöller L
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():28-33. PubMed ID: 29902565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (I): Theory, method, and phantom experiments.
van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1190-1196. PubMed ID: 29193415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the arterial input function on absolute and relative perfusion-weighted imaging penumbral flow detection: a validation with ¹⁵O-water positron emission tomography.
Zaro-Weber O; Moeller-Hartmann W; Heiss WD; Sobesky J
Stroke; 2012 Feb; 43(2):378-85. PubMed ID: 22135071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A PET-Guided Framework Supports a Multiple Arterial Input Functions Approach in DSC-MRI in Acute Stroke.
Livne M; Madai VI; Brunecker P; Zaro-Weber O; Moeller-Hartmann W; Heiss WD; Mouridsen K; Sobesky J
J Neuroimaging; 2017 Sep; 27(5):486-492. PubMed ID: 28207200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI.
de Rochefort L; Nguyen T; Brown R; Spincemaille P; Choi G; Weinsaft J; Prince MR; Wang Y
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5328-39. PubMed ID: 19175092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arterial input function in a dedicated slice for cerebral perfusion measurements in humans.
Kellner E; Mader I; Reisert M; Urbach H; Kiselev VG
MAGMA; 2018 Jun; 31(3):439-448. PubMed ID: 29224052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
Wacker CM; Bauer WR
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimal location for arterial input function measurements near the middle cerebral artery in first-pass perfusion MRI.
Bleeker EJ; van Buchem MA; van Osch MJ
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 Apr; 29(4):840-52. PubMed ID: 19142193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of myocardial perfusion with MRI using a modified dual bolus method.
Husso M; Sipola P; Kuittinen T; Manninen H; Vainio P; Hartikainen J; Saarakkala S; Töyräs J; Kuikka J
Physiol Meas; 2014 Apr; 35(4):533-47. PubMed ID: 24577344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arterial input function in perfusion MRI: a comprehensive review.
Calamante F
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2013 Oct; 74():1-32. PubMed ID: 24083460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Arterial input functions for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: requirements and signal options.
Conturo TE; Akbudak E; Kotys MS; Chen ML; Chun SJ; Hsu RM; Sweeney CC; Markham J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Dec; 22(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 16261571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A theoretical framework for retrospective
Fan L; Allen BD; Culver AE; Hsu LY; Hong K; Benefield BC; Carr JC; Lee DC; Kim D
Magn Reson Med; 2021 Aug; 86(2):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 33759238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Perfusion Quantification with 3D Gradient Echo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using a Blood Pool Contrast Agent in Skeletal Swine Muscle.
Hindel S; Sauerbrey A; Maaß M; Maderwald S; Schlamann M; Lüdemann L
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0128060. PubMed ID: 26061498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
