287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32874111)
1. How Length Sizes Affect Body Composition Estimation in Adolescent Athletes Using Bioelectrical Impedance.
Utczás K; Tróznai Z; Pálinkás G; Kalabiska I; Petridis L
J Sports Sci Med; 2020 Sep; 19(3):577-584. PubMed ID: 32874111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of lean body mass in obese children.
Campanozzi A; Dabbas M; Ruiz JC; Ricour C; Goulet O
Eur J Pediatr; 2008 May; 167(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 17618458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fat-free mass in adolescent athletes: Accuracy of bioimpedance equations and identification of new predictive equations.
Koury JC; Ribeiro MA; Massarani FA; Vieira F; Marini E
Nutrition; 2019 Apr; 60():59-65. PubMed ID: 30529187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of body composition methods during weight loss in obese women using herbal formula.
Kim HJ; Gallagher D; Song MY
Am J Chin Med; 2005; 33(6):851-8. PubMed ID: 16355441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of body composition assessment methods in climbers: Which is better?
Arias Téllez MJ; Carrasco F; España Romero V; Inostroza J; Bustamante A; Solar Altamirano I
PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224291. PubMed ID: 31747391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of segmental body composition estimated by bioelectrical impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Wingo BC; Barry VG; Ellis AC; Gower BA
Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2018 Dec; 28():141-147. PubMed ID: 30390872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appendicular Body Composition Analysis: Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Division I College Athletes.
Brewer GJ; Blue MNM; Hirsch KR; Peterjohn AM; Smith-Ryan AE
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):2920-2925. PubMed ID: 31469766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Similarities and discrepancies between commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis system and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in 10-14-year-old children.
Ohara K; Nakamura H; Kouda K; Fujita Y; Mase T; Momoi K; Nishiyama T
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17420. PubMed ID: 37833453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of a Bioelectrical Impedance Device against the Reference Method Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Anthropometry for the Evaluation of Body Composition in Adults.
Day K; Kwok A; Evans A; Mata F; Verdejo-Garcia A; Hart K; Ward LC; Truby H
Nutrients; 2018 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 30308974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Explaining Discrepancies Between Total and Segmental DXA and BIA Body Composition Estimates Using Bayesian Regression.
Tinsley GM; Moore ML; Rafi Z; Griffiths N; Harty PS; Stratton MT; Benavides ML; Dellinger JR; Adamson BT
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 32571645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Group and individual agreement between field and dual X-ray absorptiometry-based body composition techniques in children from standard schools and a sports academy.
Gerasimidis K; Shepherd S; Rashid R; Edwards CA; Ahmed F
J Acad Nutr Diet; 2014 Jan; 114(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 24021735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of two portable bioelectrical impedance analyses for the assessment of body composition in school age children.
Lee LW; Liao YS; Lu HK; Hsiao PL; Chen YY; Chi CC; Hsieh KC
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171568. PubMed ID: 28158304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis: a valuable tool for the measurement of body composition in children.
Tyrrell VJ; Richards G; Hofman P; Gillies GF; Robinson E; Cutfield WS
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Feb; 25(2):273-8. PubMed ID: 11410831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods over Materials: The Need for Sport-Specific Equations to Accurately Predict Fat Mass Using Bioimpedance Analysis or Anthropometry.
Campa F; Matias CN; Moro T; Cerullo G; Casolo A; Teixeira FJ; Paoli A
Nutrients; 2023 Jan; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36678150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of body composition assessment methods in pediatric intestinal failure.
Mehta NM; Raphael B; Guteirrez IM; Quinn N; Mitchell PD; Litman HJ; Jaksic T; Duggan CP
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2014 Jul; 59(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 24614122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Body Fat Analysis in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Multifrequency Bioimpedance Assay and Anthropometry Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Ravindranath J; Pillai PP; Parameswaran S; Kamalanathan SK; Pal GK
J Ren Nutr; 2016 Sep; 26(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 27238245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy men and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry].
Freitas Júnior IF; Rupp de Paiva SA; de Godoy I; Smaili Santos SM; Campana AO
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2005 Jun; 55(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16335221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study.
Buckinx F; Reginster JY; Dardenne N; Croisiser JL; Kaux JF; Beaudart C; Slomian J; Bruyère O
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():60. PubMed ID: 25887598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Svantesson U; Zander M; Klingberg S; Slinde F
J Negat Results Biomed; 2008 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 18211680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Body composition by simple anthropometry, bioimpedance and DXA in preschool children: interrelationships among methods].
Rodríguez PN; Bermúdez EF; Rodríguez GS; Spina MA; Zeni SN; Friedman SM; Exeni RA
Arch Argent Pediatr; 2008 Apr; 106(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18661034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
