These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3287503)

  • 1. [A possible role of magnetic resonance in the follow-up of renal transplants].
    Gremo L; Avataneo T; Borrè A; Potenzoni F; Colla L; Segoloni G
    Radiol Med; 1988 May; 75(5):505-9. PubMed ID: 3287503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Magnetic resonance in renal transplants].
    Gremo L; Avataneo T; Potenzoni F; Colla L; Segoloni G
    Radiol Med; 1988; 75(1-2):65-9. PubMed ID: 3279474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Duplex Doppler study of the transplanted kidney].
    Zompatori M; Gavelli G; Canini R; Fatone F; Faenza A; Bernasconi A
    Radiol Med; 1989; 78(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 2675204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Echographic monitoring of 80 renal transplants. Critical analysis of signs of graft rejection].
    Chiesa GM; Soardi GA; Boschiero L; Dean P
    Radiol Med; 1987 Mar; 73(3):208-11. PubMed ID: 3550905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Duplex sonography and magnetic resonance tomography in the clarification of nephrologic complications following kidney transplantation].
    Gückel C; Krestin GP; Wienand P
    Rofo; 1989 Nov; 151(5):547-52. PubMed ID: 2554406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance imaging of renal transplants: its value in the differentiation of acute rejection and cyclosporin A nephrotoxicity.
    te Strake L; Schultze Kool LJ; Paul LC; Tegzess AM; Weening JJ; Hermans J; Doornbos J; Bluemm RG; Bloem JL
    Clin Radiol; 1988 May; 39(3):220-8. PubMed ID: 3293883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Differential diagnostic evaluation of a dysfunctional kidney transplant by magnetic resonance tomography].
    Sievers KW; Kruschke A; Albrecht KH; Walz M
    Urologe A; 1995 Nov; 34(6):475-9. PubMed ID: 8848860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Acute renal allograft rejection. Comparative value of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging.
    Yap HK; Dietrich RB; Kangarloo H; Marik J; Fine RN; Ettenger RB
    Transplantation; 1987 Feb; 43(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 3544384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imaging of the renal transplant: comparison of MRI with duplex sonography.
    Browne RF; Tuite DJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(4):461-82. PubMed ID: 16447085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Follow-up monitoring of kidney transplants with color-coded duplex sonography].
    Fobbe F; Schudrowitsch L; Dietzel M; Wolf KJ
    Rofo; 1989 Jan; 150(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 2536501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The LifeLink Foundation and cadaver kidney transplantation in Tampa.
    LeFor WM; Wright CE; Bowers VD; Heinrichs DF; Shires DL
    Clin Transpl; 1999; ():149-58. PubMed ID: 11038633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin A microemulsion in renal transplantation: 2 year follow-up results.
    Krämer BK; Montagnino G; Del Castillo D; Margreiter R; Sperschneider H; Olbricht CJ; Krüger B; Ortuño J; Köhler H; Kunzendorf U; Stummvoll HK; Tabernero JM; Mühlbacher F; Rivero M; Arias M;
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2005 May; 20(5):968-73. PubMed ID: 15741208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fate of renal transplants in patients with IgA nephropathy.
    Frohnert PP; Donadio JV; Velosa JA; Holley KE; Sterioff S
    Clin Transplant; 1997 Apr; 11(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 9113449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pancreas transplant outcomes for United States (US) cases as reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and the International Pancreas Transplant Registry (IPTR).
    Gruessner AC; Sutherland DE
    Clin Transpl; 2008; ():45-56. PubMed ID: 19708445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Renal graft survival in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus].
    Chew-Wong A; Soltero L; Diná E; Alvarez-Sandoval E; Alberú J; Gamba G; Correa-Rotter R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2002; 54(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 11995403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating transplant kidneys: nuclear magnetic resonance tomography in comparison with sonography].
    Reuther G; Wanjura D; Schuster J; Zanker B
    Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jul; 40(7):215-21. PubMed ID: 3303283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Characterization and staging of renal tumors: significance of MRI diagnostics].
    Kalinka A; Gerlach A; Arlart IP; Günes N; Hauser TK; Würstlin S; Bosse A
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16508837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Osteonecrosis of the hip in renal transplant recipients. Changes in functional status and magnetic resonance imaging findings over three years in three hundred five patients.
    Le Parc JM; André T; Helenon O; Benoit J; Paolaggi JB; Kreis H
    Rev Rhum Engl Ed; 1996 Jun; 63(6):413-20. PubMed ID: 8817751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The significance of BOLD MRI in differentiation between renal transplant rejection and acute tubular necrosis.
    Han F; Xiao W; Xu Y; Wu J; Wang Q; Wang H; Zhang M; Chen J
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Aug; 23(8):2666-72. PubMed ID: 18308769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.