These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32875590)

  • 1. On the relationship between association and surrogacy when both the surrogate and true endpoint are binary outcomes.
    Meyvisch P; Alonso A; Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2020 Nov; 39(26):3867-3878. PubMed ID: 32875590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the predictive value of a binary surrogate for a binary true endpoint based on the minimum probability of a prediction error.
    Meyvisch P; Alonso A; Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G
    Pharm Stat; 2019 May; 18(3):304-315. PubMed ID: 30575256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An information-theoretic approach for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints based on causal inference.
    Alonso A; Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Buyse M; Burzykowski T
    Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):669-77. PubMed ID: 26864244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the relationship between the causal-inference and meta-analytic paradigms for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints.
    Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Alonso A
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(8):1281-98. PubMed ID: 26612787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing a surrogate predictive value: a causal inference approach.
    Alonso A; Van der Elst W; Meyvisch P
    Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1083-1098. PubMed ID: 27966231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A maximum entropy approach for the evaluation of surrogate endpoints based on causal inference.
    Alonso A; Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4525-4538. PubMed ID: 30141219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The individual-level surrogate threshold effect in a causal-inference setting with normally distributed endpoints.
    Van der Elst W; Abad AA; Coppenolle H; Meyvisch P; Molenberghs G
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Nov; 20(6):1216-1231. PubMed ID: 34018666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reflection on the causal interpretation of individual-level surrogacy.
    Alonso A; Van Der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Florez AJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):529-540. PubMed ID: 30773114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reflection on the possibility of finding a good surrogate.
    Alonso A; Meyvisch P; Van der Elst W; Molenberghs G; Verbeke G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):468-477. PubMed ID: 30686082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surrogacy assessment using principal stratification when surrogate and outcome measures are multivariate normal.
    Conlon AS; Taylor JM; Elliott MR
    Biostatistics; 2014 Apr; 15(2):266-83. PubMed ID: 24285772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surrogacy assessment using principal stratification with multivariate normal and Gaussian copula models.
    Taylor JM; Conlon AS; Elliott MR
    Clin Trials; 2015 Aug; 12(4):317-22. PubMed ID: 25490988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. surrosurv: An R package for the evaluation of failure time surrogate endpoints in individual patient data meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.
    Rotolo F; Paoletti X; Michiels S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 155():189-198. PubMed ID: 29512498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A perfect correlate does not a surrogate make.
    Baker SG; Kramer BS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2003 Sep; 3():16. PubMed ID: 12962545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporating baseline covariates to validate surrogate endpoints with a constant biomarker under control arm.
    Roberts EK; Elliott MR; Taylor JMG
    Stat Med; 2021 Dec; 40(29):6605-6618. PubMed ID: 34528260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical challenges in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in randomized trials.
    Molenberghs G; Buyse M; Geys H; Renard D; Burzykowski T; Alonso A
    Control Clin Trials; 2002 Dec; 23(6):607-25. PubMed ID: 12505240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to use frailtypack for validating failure-time surrogate endpoints using individual patient data from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.
    Sofeu CL; Rondeau V
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228098. PubMed ID: 31990928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intermediate markers as surrogate endpoints in cancer research.
    Schatzkin A
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 2000 Aug; 14(4):887-905. PubMed ID: 10949779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analysis for surrogacy: accelerated failure time models and semicompeting risks modeling.
    Ghosh D; Taylor JM; Sargent DJ
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):226-32. PubMed ID: 21668903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Links between analysis of surrogate endpoints and endogeneity.
    Ghosh D; Elliott MR; Taylor JM
    Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2869-79. PubMed ID: 20803482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of surrogate endpoints in cancer clinical trials via principal stratification with an application to a prostate cancer trial.
    Tanaka S; Matsuyama Y; Ohashi Y
    Stat Med; 2017 Aug; 36(19):2963-2977. PubMed ID: 28485043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.