These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32875633)

  • 1. Marginal soft tissue recession after lateral guided bone regeneration at implant site: A long-term study with at least 5 years of loading.
    Cairo F; Nieri M; Cavalcanti R; Landi L; Rupe A; Sforza NM; Pace R; Barbato L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 32875633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes of GBR procedures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review.
    Chiapasco M; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 4():113-23. PubMed ID: 19663958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study.
    Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 11432655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guided bone regeneration and abutment connection augment the buccal soft tissue contour: 3-year results of a prospective comparative clinical study.
    Benic GI; Ge Y; Gallucci GO; Jung RE; Schneider D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Feb; 28(2):219-225. PubMed ID: 26856399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing.
    Jung RE; Herzog M; Wolleb K; Ramel CF; Thoma DS; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Mar; 28(3):348-354. PubMed ID: 26923088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implants sites with concomitant bone regeneration using a resorbable or non-resorbable membrane result in stable marginal bone levels and similar profilometric outcomes over 5 years.
    Naenni N; Stucki L; Hüsler J; Schneider D; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE; Thoma DS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Aug; 32(8):893-904. PubMed ID: 33977571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized-controlled clinical trial evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years of dental implants placed in bone regenerated by means of GBR techniques with or without the addition of BMP-2.
    Jung RE; Windisch SI; Eggenschwiler AM; Thoma DS; Weber FE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):660-6. PubMed ID: 19489935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and radiographic intra-subject comparison of implants placed with or without guided bone regeneration: 15-year results.
    Benic GI; Bernasconi M; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    J Clin Periodontol; 2017 Mar; 44(3):315-325. PubMed ID: 27978603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peri-implant Hard and Soft Tissue Stability in Implants Placed Simultaneously Versus Delayed with Intraoral Block Bone Grafts in Horizontal Defects: A Retrospective Case Series Study.
    Aloy-Prósper A; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Camacho-Alonso F; Peñarrocha-Diago M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 26800170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2- to 4-year follow-up.
    Buser D; Bornstein MM; Weber HP; Grütter L; Schmid B; Belser UC
    J Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 79(9):1773-81. PubMed ID: 18771381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results.
    Benić GI; Jung RE; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 19302239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Waller T; Herzog M; Thoma DS; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):517-525. PubMed ID: 32011015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients.
    Buser D; Halbritter S; Hart C; Bornstein MM; Grütter L; Chappuis V; Belser UC
    J Periodontol; 2009 Jan; 80(1):152-62. PubMed ID: 19228101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
    Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing marginal bone loss at a hydrophilic implant design placed with or without GBR procedures: A 5-year retrospective study.
    Zumstein T; Schütz S; Sahlin H; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 21(5):817-826. PubMed ID: 31432605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Brügger LV; Bienz SP; Hüsler J; Hämmerle CHF; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1455-1465. PubMed ID: 34543460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Results of Single Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Placed and Loaded with Different Protocols: A Long-Term (7 to 10 years) Retrospective Multicenter Study.
    Guarnieri R; Testarelli L; Zuffetti F; Bertani P; Testori T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(4):841-849. PubMed ID: 32724939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.