These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32875682)

  • 21. Accuracy of the newly formulated vinyl siloxanether elastomeric impression material.
    Stober T; Johnson GH; Schmitter M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):228-39. PubMed ID: 20362766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of disinfection on irreversible hydrocolloid and alternative impression materials and the resultant gypsum casts.
    Suprono MS; Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Winer MS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Oct; 108(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 23031732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative Evaluation of Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Poly Ether, Vinyl Siloxane, and Vinyl Siloxane Ether Impression Materials: An
    Rose S; Aravindakshan S; Mohamed Usman JA; Mohamed R; Menon S; Shafiullah RS; Salloum MG
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Jun; 13(Suppl 1):S851-S856. PubMed ID: 34447214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D evaluation of the effect of disinfectants on dimensional accuracy and stability of two elastomeric impression materials.
    Soganci G; Cinar D; Caglar A; Yagiz A
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Jul; 37(4):675-684. PubMed ID: 29848853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of newly formulated fast-setting elastomeric impression materials.
    Wadhwani CP; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):530-9. PubMed ID: 15942613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Comparative Evaluation of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Detail Reproduction of Four Hydrophilic Vinyl Polysiloxane Impression Materials Tested Under Dry, Moist, and Wet Conditions-An In Vitro Study.
    Nagrath R; Lahori M; Agrawal M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Dec; 14(Suppl 1):59-66. PubMed ID: 26199493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers.
    Clancy JM; Scandrett FR; Ettinger RL
    J Oral Rehabil; 1983 Jul; 10(4):325-33. PubMed ID: 6577158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of a new ring-opening metathesis elastomeric dental impression material with spray and immersion disinfection.
    Kronström MH; Johnson GH; Hompesch RW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 20105678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fine detail reproduction of very high viscosity poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):368-70. PubMed ID: 2700631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the surface detail reproduction of flexible die material systems.
    Gerrow JD; Price RB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 9791798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Qualitative and quantitative three-dimensional accuracy of a single tooth captured by elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Schaefer O; Schmidt M; Goebel R; Kuepper H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Sep; 108(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 22944312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of Intermixing Brands on the Dimensional Accuracy of Master Cast using Putty-wash Impression Technique.
    Sayed ME; Sayed ME; Al-Makramani BM; Al-Sanabani FA; Mohamed MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Sep; 17(9):734-739. PubMed ID: 27733716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T; Finger WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dimensional Accuracy of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic VPS Impression Materials Using Different Impression Techniques - An Invitro Study.
    Basapogu S; Pilla A; Pathipaka S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 Feb; 10(2):ZC56-9. PubMed ID: 27042587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    O'Mahony A; Spencer P; Williams K; Corcoran J
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Mar; 31(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 11203927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.