These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32876424)

  • 1. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
    Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Dyer C; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 34978538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Stoney J; Graves SE; de Steiger RN; Rainbird S; Kelly TL; Hatton A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Nov; 478(11):2625-2636. PubMed ID: 32898048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What Is the Outcome of the First Revision Procedure of Primary THA for Osteoarthritis? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Lewis PL; Harris I; Lorimer MF; Graves SE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1952-1970. PubMed ID: 35980886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.
    de Steiger RN; Hatton A; Peng Y; Graves S
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1244-1253. PubMed ID: 32345846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Can We Learn From Surgeons Who Perform THA and TKA and Have the Lowest Revision Rates? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Lorimer M; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Mar; 480(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 34677162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standard, Large-Head, Dual-Mobility, or Constrained-Liner Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for a Diagnosis of Dislocation: An Analysis of 1,275 Revision Total Hip Replacements.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Hatton A; de Steiger RN
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Dec; 102(23):2060-2067. PubMed ID: 33264216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Otto Aufranc Award: Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA Reduced Dislocation, Rerevision, and Reoperation Compared With Large Femoral Heads.
    Hartzler MA; Abdel MP; Sculco PK; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 29529658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can Dislocation of a Constrained Liner Be Salvaged With Dual-mobility Constructs in Revision THA?
    Chalmers BP; Pallante GD; Taunton MJ; Sierra RJ; Trousdale RT
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 29529660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Is the Frequency of Fracture of Ceramic Components in THA? Results from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 1997 to 2017.
    Hallan G; Fenstad AM; Furnes O
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Jun; 478(6):1254-1261. PubMed ID: 32348085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A; Agrawal S; Cuthbert A; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries.
    Farey JE; Masters J; Cuthbert AR; Iversen P; van Steenbergen LN; Prentice HA; Adie S; Sayers A; Whitehouse MR; Paxton EW; Costa ML; Overgaard S; Rogmark C; Rolfson O; Harris IA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Oct; 480(10):1912-1925. PubMed ID: 35767813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Fractured Neck of Femur Revised to Total Hip Arthroplasty: Outcomes Are Influenced by Patient Age Not Articulation Options.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Peng Y; Graves SE; Bingham R
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Aug; 36(8):2927-2935. PubMed ID: 33941411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Isolated Mobile Component Exchange an Option in the Management of Intraprosthetic Dislocation of a Dual Mobility Cup?
    Wegrzyn J; Malatray M; Pibarot V; Anania G; Béjui-Hugues J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Feb; 478(2):279-287. PubMed ID: 31794492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dual-mobility or Constrained Liners Are More Effective Than Preoperative Bariatric Surgery in Prevention of THA Dislocation.
    Hernigou P; Trousselier M; Roubineau F; Bouthors C; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2202-10. PubMed ID: 27130648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?
    Cafri G; Paxton EW; Love R; Bini SA; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 May; 475(5):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 27385222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.
    Tsikandylakis G; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Eskelinen A; Mäkelä KT; Hallan G; Furnes ON; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Mohaddes M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2367-2378. PubMed ID: 30260863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Use of Computer Navigation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Associated with a Reduced Rate of Revision for Dislocation: A Study of 6,912 Navigated THA Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.
    Agarwal S; Eckhard L; Walter WL; Peng A; Hatton A; Donnelly B; de Steiger R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Oct; 103(20):1900-1905. PubMed ID: 34143758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.