BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

822 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32876473)

  • 1. Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.
    Costa DN; Jia L; Subramanian N; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Recchimuzzi DZ; de Leon AD; Arraj P; Pedrosa I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 32876473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement of PI-RADS Version 2 and Version 2.1 for the Detection of Transition Zone Prostate Cancers.
    Wei CG; Zhang YY; Pan P; Chen T; Yu HC; Dai GC; Tu J; Yang S; Zhao WL; Shen JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 May; 216(5):1247-1256. PubMed ID: 32755220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers.
    Yilmaz EC; Shih JH; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Garcia C; Hazen LA; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e221309. PubMed ID: 37129493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness and Accuracy of MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Based on PI-RADS v2.1 Category in Transition/Peripheral Zone of the Prostate.
    Liu Y; Wang S; Xu G; Zhou B; Zhang Y; Ye B; Xiang L; Zhang Y; Xu H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 58(3):709-717. PubMed ID: 36773016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct Comparison of PI-RADS Version 2 and 2.1 in Transition Zone Lesions for Detection of Prostate Cancer: Preliminary Experience.
    Byun J; Park KJ; Kim MH; Kim JK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):577-586. PubMed ID: 32045072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.
    Tamada T; Kido A; Takeuchi M; Yamamoto A; Miyaji Y; Kanomata N; Sone T
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Dec; 121():108704. PubMed ID: 31669798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of prostate cancer in PI-RADS version 2.1 T2-weighted transition zone 'nodule in nodule' and 'homogeneous mildly hypointense area between nodules' criteria: MRI-radical prostatectomy histopathological evaluation.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Flood TA; Carrion I; Dallaire FB; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7792-7801. PubMed ID: 33782767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
    Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy.
    Taghipour M; Ziaei A; Alessandrino F; Hassanzadeh E; Harisinghani M; Vangel M; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Apr; 44(4):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 30361870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center.
    Hermie I; Van Besien J; De Visschere P; Lumen N; Decaestecker K
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():92-98. PubMed ID: 31005183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RIDS v2) to detect prostate cancer can prevent unnecessary biopsies and invasive treatment.
    Liu C; Liu SL; Wang ZX; Yu K; Feng CX; Ke Z; Wang L; Zeng XY
    Asian J Androl; 2018; 20(5):459-464. PubMed ID: 29667616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
    Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining clinical and MRI data to manage PI-RADS 3 lesions and reduce excessive biopsy.
    Yang S; Zhao W; Tan S; Zhang Y; Wei C; Chen T; Shen J
    Transl Androl Urol; 2020 Jun; 9(3):1252-1261. PubMed ID: 32676408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.
    Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Laqua N; Klingebiel M; Martin O; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():1-6. PubMed ID: 30927932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low cancer yield in PI-RADS 3 upgraded to 4 by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: is it time to reconsider scoring categorization?
    Messina E; Pecoraro M; Laschena L; Bicchetti M; Proietti F; Ciardi A; Leonardo C; Sciarra A; Girometti R; Catalano C; Panebianco V
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Aug; 33(8):5828-5839. PubMed ID: 37045981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PI-RADS v2.1 evaluation of prostate "nodule in nodule" variants: clinical, imaging, and pathological features.
    Sun M; Xu L; Zhang X; Cao L; Chen W; Liu K; Wu H; Xie D
    Insights Imaging; 2024 Mar; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 38499703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sub-differentiation of PI-RADS 3 lesions in TZ by advanced diffusion-weighted imaging to aid the biopsy decision process.
    Zhou KP; Huang HB; Bu C; Luo ZX; Huang WS; Xie LZ; Liu QY; Bian J
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1092073. PubMed ID: 36845749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.