303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32876788)
1. Meta-analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer.
Lin J; Lin S; Chen Z; Zheng B; Lin Y; Zheng Y; Liu Y; Chen SQ
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 Mar; 406(2):283-299. PubMed ID: 32876788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes.
Wang S; Tang J; Sun W; Yao H; Li Z
Int J Surg; 2022 Jan; 97():106196. PubMed ID: 34922029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and oncological outcomes of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang K; Li W; Liu N; Cai J; Zhang Y
Updates Surg; 2022 Jun; 74(3):833-842. PubMed ID: 35304899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: a meta-analysis.
Ma B; Huang XZ; Gao P; Zhao JH; Song YX; Sun JX; Chen XW; Wang ZN
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1479-88. PubMed ID: 26238472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Colorectal resection via natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic extraction: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.
Chin YH; Decruz GM; Ng CH; Tan HQM; Lim F; Foo FJ; Tai CH; Chong CS
Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Jan; 25(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 32851500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Safety and Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic NOSE Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.
Liu RJ; Zhang CD; Fan YC; Pei JP; Zhang C; Dai DQ
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():597. PubMed ID: 31334119
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Natural orifice versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: meta-analysis.
Brincat SD; Lauri J; Cini C
BJS Open; 2022 May; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35640267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.
Li XW; Wang CY; Zhang JJ; Ge Z; Lin XH; Hu JH
Int J Surg; 2019 Dec; 72():102-108. PubMed ID: 31362128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison between laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery for left colorectal cancer: a randomized controlled study with 3-year follow-up results].
Chen ZZ; Xu SZ; Ding ZJ; Zhang SF; Yuan SS; Yan F; Wang ZF; Liu GY; Qiu XF; Cai JC
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 25(7):604-611. PubMed ID: 35844123
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis.
Zhang H; Lan X; Peng B; Li B
World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Oct; 25(37):5711-5731. PubMed ID: 31602170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors.
He J; Yao HB; Wang CJ; Yang QY; Qiu JM; Chen JM; Shen Z; Yang GG
World J Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 18(1):215. PubMed ID: 32814583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Comparison of the mid- and long-term outcomes between natural orifice specimen extraction surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery with abdominal auxiliary incision in the treatment of rectal cancer based on propensity score matching method].
Xu S; Zhang H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Aug; 24(8):698-703. PubMed ID: 34412187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
Li Z; Wang Q; Li B; Bai B; Zhao Q
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 15(1):207. PubMed ID: 29169362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in stage IV colorectal cancer].
Tan SJ; Jiang Y; Xi QL; Meng QY; Zhuang QL; Han YS; Wu GH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 23(6):589-596. PubMed ID: 32521980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopy surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang L; Fang C; Bi T; Han J; Zhang R; Zhou S
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 47(7):102176. PubMed ID: 37454927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery for colorectal cancer.
Zheng S; Zhao Z; Zheng H; Li J; Yang J; Zhao E
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Aug; 101(34):e30087. PubMed ID: 36042685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in colorectal neoplasms.
Yao H; Li T; Chen W; Lei S; Liu K; Liu B; Zhou J
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):9818. PubMed ID: 33972632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted resection for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a propensity-score matching study.
Zhang H; Hu H; Huang R; Guan Z; Zheng M; Xu C; Li Z; Wang Y; Zhang W; Yu L; Jin Y; Tang Q; Wang G; Wang X
Updates Surg; 2022 Apr; 74(2):599-607. PubMed ID: 34370279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Comparison of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction versus Mini-Laparotomy Specimen Extraction for Colorectal Tumours: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.
He J; Hu JF; Shao SX; Yao HB; Zhang XF; Yang GG; Shen Z
J Oncol; 2020; 2020():6204264. PubMed ID: 32454825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.
Guan X; Liu Z; Longo A; Cai JC; Tzu-Liang Chen W; Chen LC; Chun HK; Manuel da Costa Pereira J; Efetov S; Escalante R; He QS; Hu JH; Kayaalp C; Kim SH; Khan JS; Kuo LJ; Nishimura A; Nogueira F; Okuda J; Saklani A; Shafik AA; Shen MY; Son JT; Song JM; Sun DH; Uehara K; Wang GY; Wei Y; Xiong ZG; Yao HL; Yu G; Yu SJ; Zhou HT; Lee SH; Tsarkov PV; Fu CG; Wang XS;
Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf); 2019 Feb; 7(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 30792863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
