210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32877637)
1. Cost comparison of single-use versus reusable flexible ureteroscope: A systematic review.
Ventimiglia E; Godínez AJ; Traxer O; Somani BK
Turk J Urol; 2020 Nov; 46(Supp. 1):S40-S45. PubMed ID: 32877637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Flexible ureteroscopy: reuse? Or is single use the new direction?
Ventimiglia E; Somani BK; Traxer O
Curr Opin Urol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):113-119. PubMed ID: 31815748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative medico-economic study of reusable vs. single-use flexible ureteroscopes.
Al-Balushi K; Martin N; Loubon H; Baboudjian M; Michel F; Sichez PC; Martin T; Di-Crocco E; Gaillet S; Delaporte V; Akiki A; Faure A; Karsenty G; Lechevallier E; Boissier R
Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Oct; 51(10):1735-1741. PubMed ID: 31317310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can the introduction of single-use flexible ureteroscopes increase the longevity of reusable flexible ureteroscopes at a high volume centre?
Ventimiglia E; Smyth N; Doizi S; Jiménez Godínez A; Barghouthy Y; Corrales Acosta MA; Kamkoum H; Somani B; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):251-256. PubMed ID: 34424373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes are more cost-effective than single-use scopes: results of a systematic review from PETRA Uro-group.
Talso M; Goumas IK; Kamphuis GM; Dragos L; Tefik T; Traxer O; Somani BK
Transl Androl Urol; 2019 Sep; 8(Suppl 4):S418-S425. PubMed ID: 31656747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repair Rate and Associated Costs of Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Rindorf DK; Tailly T; Kamphuis GM; Larsen S; Somani BK; Traxer O; Koo K
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Mar; 37():64-72. PubMed ID: 35128483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-use
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Georgescu D; Bulai C; Ene C; Popescu R; Geavlete P; Geavlete B
J Med Life; 2023 Jan; 16(1):10-15. PubMed ID: 36873117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with a reusable ureteroscope for the management of paediatric urolithiasis.
Mille E; El-Khoury E; Haddad M; Pinol J; Charbonnier M; Gastaldi P; Dariel A; Merrot T; Faure A
J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Jun; 19(3):248.e1-248.e6. PubMed ID: 36746718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective Cost Analysis of a Single-Center Reusable Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Program: A Comparative Cost Simulation of Disposable fURS as an Alternative.
Ozimek T; Schneider MH; Hupe MC; Wiessmeyer JR; Cordes J; Chlosta PL; Merseburger AS; Kramer MW
J Endourol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):1226-1230. PubMed ID: 29073769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Use and Reusable Flexible Ureteroscopes for Renal Stone Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Jun DY; Cho KS; Jeong JY; Moon YJ; Kang DH; Jung HD; Lee JY
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Oct; 58(10):. PubMed ID: 36295549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes and costs of reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes: a prospective cohort study.
Mager R; Kurosch M; Höfner T; Frees S; Haferkamp A; Neisius A
Urolithiasis; 2018 Nov; 46(6):587-593. PubMed ID: 29356873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Single use flexible ureteroscopes: a review of current technologies and cost effectiveness analysis.
Talyshinskii A; Gauhar V; Castellani D; Knoll T; Shah K; Wan SP; Somani BK
Curr Opin Urol; 2024 Mar; 34(2):110-115. PubMed ID: 37962372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single-use flexible ureteropyeloscopy: a systematic review.
Davis NF; Quinlan MR; Browne C; Bhatt NR; Manecksha RP; D'Arcy FT; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):529-536. PubMed ID: 29177820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of single-use and reusable flexible ureteroscope for renal stone management: a pooled analysis of 772 patients.
Li Y; Chen J; Zhu Z; Zeng H; Zeng F; Chen Z; Yang Z; Cui Y; Chen H; Li Y
Transl Androl Urol; 2021 Jan; 10(1):483-493. PubMed ID: 33532336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-use disposable digital flexible ureteroscopes: an ex vivo assessment and cost analysis.
Hennessey DB; Fojecki GL; Papa NP; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton D
BJU Int; 2018 May; 121 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 29656467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro Comparative Assessment of Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes Using a Standardized Ureteroscopy Training Model.
So WZ; Gauhar V; Chen K; Lu J; Chua WJ; Tiong HY
Urol Int; 2022; 106(12):1279-1286. PubMed ID: 35709703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing outcomes of single-use vs reusable ureteroscopes: a systematic review and meta analysis.
Belkovsky M; Passerotti CC; Maia RS; de Almeida Artifon EL; Otoch JP; Da Cruz JAS
Urolithiasis; 2024 Feb; 52(1):37. PubMed ID: 38413490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-Costing Analysis Demonstrates Comparable Costs for LithoVue Compared to Reusable Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes.
Taguchi K; Usawachintachit M; Tzou DT; Sherer BA; Metzler I; Isaacson D; Stoller ML; Chi T
J Endourol; 2018 Apr; 32(4):267-273. PubMed ID: 29239227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of pre- and post-surgical images of reusable and single use flexible ureteroscopes: a qualitative analysis.
Domenech A; Alliende C; Vivaldi B; Pizzi P
Cent European J Urol; 2021; 74(3):459-463. PubMed ID: 34729238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Flexible Ureteroscope Performance between Reusable and Single-Use Models.
Bragaru M; Multescu R; Geavlete P; Popescu R; Geavlete B
J Clin Med; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
