These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

499 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32878105)

  • 1. Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Fish Products with Health and Environmental Labels: Evidence from Five European Countries.
    Menozzi D; Nguyen TT; Sogari G; Taskov D; Lucas S; Castro-Rial JLS; Mora C
    Nutrients; 2020 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 32878105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumers' willingness to pay for nutritional claims fighting the obesity epidemic: the case of reduced-fat and low salt cheese in Spain.
    de-Magistris T; Lopéz-Galán B
    Public Health; 2016 Jun; 135():83-90. PubMed ID: 26996310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer attitudes and preferences towards pangasius and tilapia: The role of sustainability certification and the country of origin.
    Hinkes C; Schulze-Ehlers B
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():171-181. PubMed ID: 29733863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of nutri-score on consumers' preferences for geographical indications. Evidence from a non-hypothetical experiment.
    Stiletto A; Vecchio R; Cembalo L; Trestini S
    Appetite; 2024 Aug; 199():107400. PubMed ID: 38735306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer willingness to pay for plant-based foods produced using microbial applications to replace synthetic chemical inputs.
    Ali BM; Ang F; van der Fels-Klerx HJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0260488. PubMed ID: 34874958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consumer preferences for sustainable aquaculture products: Evidence from in-depth interviews, think aloud protocols and choice experiments.
    Risius A; Janssen M; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2017 Jun; 113():246-254. PubMed ID: 28223237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chinese consumers' valuation for prepared plant-based meat products: Does environmental information matter?
    Jiang X; Chen X; Wu L
    J Food Sci; 2024 Sep; 89(9):5823-5840. PubMed ID: 39098815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Labelling Attributes.
    Cubero Dudinskaya E; Naspetti S; Arsenos G; Caramelle-Holtz E; Latvala T; Martin-Collado D; Orsini S; Ozturk E; Zanoli R
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33672549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of information in consumer preferences for sustainable certified palm oil products in Germany.
    Richartz C; Abdulai A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271198. PubMed ID: 35877656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumers' reactions to nutrition and ingredient labelling for wine - A cross-country discrete choice experiment.
    Pabst E; Corsi AM; Vecchio R; Annunziata A; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2021 Jan; 156():104843. PubMed ID: 32818546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consumers' environmental and ethical consciousness and the use of the related food products information: The role of perceived consumer effectiveness.
    Ghvanidze S; Velikova N; Dodd TH; Oldewage-Theron W
    Appetite; 2016 Dec; 107():311-322. PubMed ID: 27554182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the Valuation of Nutritional Claims Differ among Consumers? Insights from Spain.
    Jurado F; Gracia A
    Nutrients; 2017 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 28208811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Understanding How Consumers Categorise Health Related Claims on Foods: A Consumer-Derived Typology of Health-Related Claims.
    Hodgkins CE; Egan B; Peacock M; Klepacz N; Miklavec K; Pravst I; Pohar J; Gracia A; Groeppel-Klein A; Rayner M; Raats MM
    Nutrients; 2019 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 30832373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C; Hamm U
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consumers' Trade-Off between Nutrition and Health Claims under Regulation 1924/2006: Insights from a Choice Experiment Analysis.
    Viscecchia R; Nocella G; De Devitiis B; Bimbo F; Carlucci D; Seccia A; Nardone G
    Nutrients; 2019 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 31779205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nutritional Information Using a Dietary App.
    Sadrmousavigargari S; Cubero Dudinskaya E; Mandolesi S; Naspetti S; Mojaverian SM; Zanoli R
    Nutrients; 2022 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 36501053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peer feedback can decrease consumers' willingness to pay for food: Evidence from a field experiment.
    Langer ML; Davidson KA; McFadden BR; Messer KD
    Appetite; 2022 Nov; 178():106162. PubMed ID: 35940337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Willingness-to-Pay for Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Bastounis A; Buckell J; Hartmann-Boyce J; Cook B; King S; Potter C; Bianchi F; Rayner M; Jebb SA
    Nutrients; 2021 Jul; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 34444837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health Innovation in Patty Products. The Role of Food Neophobia in Consumers' Non-Hypothetical Willingness to Pay, Purchase Intention and Hedonic Evaluation.
    Kallas Z; Vitale M; Gil JM
    Nutrients; 2019 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 30791660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of consumers' willingness to pay for sustainable food products.
    Li S; Kallas Z
    Appetite; 2021 Aug; 163():105239. PubMed ID: 33794258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.