226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32878401)
21. Diagnosis of approximal caries: bite-wing radiology versus the Ultrasound Caries Detector. An in vitro study.
Matalon S; Feuerstein O; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 May; 95(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12738956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Digital camera resolution and proximal caries detection.
Prapayasatok S; Janhom A; Verochana K; Pramojanee S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jul; 35(4):253-7. PubMed ID: 16798921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of the effects of postprocessing settings in digital bitewing radiographs on proximal caries detection.
Abdinian M; Keshani F; Sadeghi F; Soltani P; Spagnuolo G; Rengo C
Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e889. PubMed ID: 38712390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vitro performance of near infrared light transillumination at 780-nm and digital radiography for detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.
Abogazalah N; Eckert GJ; Ando M
J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():44-50. PubMed ID: 28559050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) System: Comparison with Intraoral Periapical Radiography in Proximal Caries Detection.
Valizadeh S; Tavakkoli MA; Karimi Vasigh H; Azizi Z; Zarrabian T
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 22991626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Detection of cavitated or non-cavitated approximal enamel caries lesions using CMOS and CCD digital X-ray sensors and conventional D and F-speed films at different exposure conditions.
Bottenberg P; Jacquet W; Stachniss V; Wellnitz J; Schulte AG
Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 21698985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of diagnosis of early stage interproximal caries with bitewing radiographs and periapical images using consensus reference.
Takahashi N; Lee C; Da Silva JD; Ohyama H; Roppongi M; Kihara H; Hatakeyama W; Ishikawa-Nagai S; Izumisawa M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20170450. PubMed ID: 30222021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study.
Wenzel A; Borg E; Hintze H; Gröndahl HG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):250-4. PubMed ID: 9161170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnosis of Interproximal Caries Lesions in Bitewing Radiographs Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Software.
García-Cañas Á; Bonfanti-Gris M; Paraíso-Medina S; Martínez-Rus F; Pradíes G
Caries Res; 2022; 56(5-6):503-511. PubMed ID: 36318884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?
Lima CAS; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Feb; 129(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31474575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars.
Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ
Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Detection of proximal caries in conventional and digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
Rockenbach MI; Veeck EB; da Costa NP
Stomatologija; 2008; 10(4):115-20. PubMed ID: 19223710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K; Petersson A; Warfvinge G; Nilsson M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of two X-ray tube voltages on detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs. An in vitro study.
Hellén-Halme K
Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Apr; 15(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 20143243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Application of panoramic radiography with a multilayer imaging program for detecting proximal caries: a preliminary clinical study.
Jeon KJ; Han SS; Lee C; Choi YJ; Jung HI; Kim YH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Dec; 49(8):20190467. PubMed ID: 32348170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
