These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3287884)

  • 1. Contrast media-related complications during cardiac catheterization using Hexabrix or Renografin in high-risk patients.
    Feldman RL; Jalowiec DA; Hill JA; Lambert CR
    Am J Cardiol; 1988 Jun; 61(15):1334-7. PubMed ID: 3287884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 following left ventriculography and coronary arteriography.
    Svenson RH
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S333-4. PubMed ID: 6392162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A double-blind clinical comparison of the electrophysiologic adverse effects of Hexabrix and Renografin-76.
    Wolf GL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S328-32. PubMed ID: 6392161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the use of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Tonkin IL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S344-9. PubMed ID: 6392164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Anthony CL; Tonkin IL; Marin-Garcia J; Paul RN; Bell ED; Brooks E; Eastham ED; Fowler SL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S335-43. PubMed ID: 6392163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-blind comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in computed tomography.
    Berland LL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S376-7. PubMed ID: 6392168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S320-2. PubMed ID: 6392159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
    Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ
    Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A double-blind clinical study comparing the safety and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in contrast enhanced computed body tomography.
    McClennan BL; Lee JK; DiSantis DJ; James M
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S378-84. PubMed ID: 6392169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A double-blind clinical study comparing tolerability, safety, and efficacy of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous subtraction angiography.
    Nelson JA; Sherry RA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S366-7. PubMed ID: 6392166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of hexabrix and Renografin 60 in peripheral arteriography.
    Sacks BA; Ellison HP; Bartek S; Vine HS; Palestrant AM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 May; 140(5):975-7. PubMed ID: 6601445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of low osmolality contrast materials on coronary hemodynamics, myocardial function, and coronary sinus osmolality in normal and ischemic states.
    Deutsch AL; Gerber KH; Haigler FH; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1982; 17(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 7118517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-60 in knee arthrography.
    Apple JS; Martinez S; Khoury MB; Royster R; Allen S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 3873834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pain during angiography: a randomized double-blind trial comparing ioxaglate and diatrizoate.
    Pathria M; Somers S; Gill G
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Mar; 38(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2953734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary evaluation of Hexabrix for temporomandibular joint arthrography.
    Katzberg RW
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S387-8. PubMed ID: 6392170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-dose clinical urography with the low-osmolality contrast agent Hexabrix: comparison with a conventional contrast agent.
    Spataro RF; Katzberg RW; Fischer HW; McMannis MJ
    Radiology; 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):9-14. PubMed ID: 3538156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A double-blind comparative study of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 in aortography and visceral arteriography.
    Barth KH; Mertens MA
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S323-5. PubMed ID: 6392160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hexabrix as a contrast agent for hysterosalpingography.
    Winfield AC; Maxson WS; Harding DR; Diggs J; Wentz AC
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):232-3. PubMed ID: 6729127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A double-blind clinical comparison of Hexabrix and Renografin-76 for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Turski PA; Gentry LR; Matozzi F; Verma S
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S363-5. PubMed ID: 6392165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.