151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3287906)
1. Corporate influence on threshold limit values.
Castleman BI; Ziem GE
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):531-59. PubMed ID: 3287906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. But they are not thresholds: a critical analysis of the documentation of Threshold Limit Values.
Roach SA; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1990; 17(6):727-53. PubMed ID: 2188503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold limit values, permissible exposure limits, and feasibility: the bases for exposure limits in the United States.
Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1993 May; 23(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 8506846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time to reconsider TLVs.
Djerassi L
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):611-2. PubMed ID: 3376953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of threshold limit values in U.S. air pollution policy.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG
Am J Ind Med; 1992; 21(3):383-96. PubMed ID: 1585949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The origin and development of the asbestos Threshold Limit Value: scientific indifference and corporate influence.
Egilman DS; Reinert AA
Int J Health Serv; 1995; 25(4):667-96. PubMed ID: 8575867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Corporate influence on threshold limit values by Castleman and Ziem.
Frank AL
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):607-8. PubMed ID: 3376951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Corporate influence on threshold limit values.
Davis JM
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):615. PubMed ID: 3376955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological exposure index as a complement to the TLV.
Lowry LK
J Occup Med; 1986 Aug; 28(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 3746477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. TLVs--what now?
Muir DC
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):605-6. PubMed ID: 3376950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Vinyl chloride and 1,2-dichloroethane: classification and assessment of carcinogenicity, guidelines, threshold values, and standards developed by national and international entities, organizations, and agencies].
Binetti R; Costamagna FM; Marcello I
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11296535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A quantitative analysis of factors affecting PELs and TLVs for carcinogens.
Smith JS; Mendeloff JM
Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1223-34. PubMed ID: 10765459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The contribution of acute toxicity in animals to occupational exposure limits of chemical substances.
Suda M; Tsuruta H; Honma T
Ind Health; 1999 Jan; 37(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 10052296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TLVs--a personal opinion.
Dror K
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):617-8. PubMed ID: 3376956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Corporate occupational exposure limits: the current state of affairs.
Paustenback D; Langner R
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Dec; 47(12):809-18. PubMed ID: 3799484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard.
Robinson JC; Paxman DG; Rappaport SM
Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 1989435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard setting.
Duncan KP
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):619-20. PubMed ID: 3376957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Credibility in the TLV process.
Abrams HK
Am J Ind Med; 1988; 13(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 3376952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification and classification of carcinogens: procedures of the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Value Committee, ACGIH. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists.
Spirtas R; Steinberg M; Wands RC; Weisburger EK
Am J Public Health; 1986 Oct; 76(10):1232-5. PubMed ID: 3752326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
