These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32879713)

  • 1. Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions.
    Ryu JE; Kim YL; Kong HJ; Chang HS; Jung JH
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Aug; 12(4):225-232. PubMed ID: 32879713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Yatani H; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Internal Fit and Marginal Adaptation of Provisional Crowns Fabricated with Three Different Techniques.
    Wu J; Xie H; Sadr A; Chung KH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33499198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D printing technology.
    Chaturvedi S; Alqahtani NM; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA
    Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 32280071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of cement film thickness of veneers and crowns made with conventional and 3D printed provisional materials.
    Sampaio CS; Niemann KD; Schweitzer DD; Hirata R; Atria PJ
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Apr; 33(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 32937028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Ramos V
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 31702087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology.
    Khanlar LN; Francis C; Basir Barmak A; Rios ALS; Ashtiani RE; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 36810925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the internal fit and marginal integrity of interim crowns made by different manufacturing methods.
    Peng CC; Chung KH; Yau HT; Ramos V
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Mar; 123(3):514-522. PubMed ID: 31353116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
    de Paula Silveira AC; Chaves SB; Hilgert LA; Ribeiro AP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 27677214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Accuracy of Fit of Crowns Made From Wax Patterns Produced Conventionally (Hand Formed) and Via CAD/CAM Technology.
    Fathi HM; Al-Masoody AH; El-Ghezawi N; Johnson A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Mar; 24(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 27039473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micro-CT analysis of 3D printed provisional crowns fitting.
    Alsubaiy EF
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(1):259-268. PubMed ID: 36057803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Models Fabricated by a Chair-side Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Printer in Stomatology.
    Yang H; Liu Y
    Oper Dent; 2022 Sep; 47(5):E233-E240. PubMed ID: 36121719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Marginal and Internal Fit of Crowns Fabricated Using Different CAD/CAM Technologies.
    Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhao Y; Zhang X
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Jun; 24(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 25219401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New Intraoral Scanner-Based Chairside Measurement Method to Investigate the Internal Fit of Crowns: A Clinical Trial.
    Schlenz MA; Vogler J; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Mar; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32218254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An
    Dureja I; Yadav B; Malhotra P; Dabas N; Bhargava A; Pahwa R
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(4):314-320. PubMed ID: 30449959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown.
    May KB; Russell MM; Razzoog ME; Lang BR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):394-404. PubMed ID: 9791784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.