BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32879785)

  • 1. Stereotest Comparison: Efficacy, Reliability, and Variability of a New Glasses-Free Stereotest.
    McCaslin AG; Vancleef K; Hubert L; Read JCA; Port N
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Aug; 9(9):29. PubMed ID: 32879785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ASTEROID stereotest v1.0: lower stereo thresholds using smaller, denser and faster dots.
    Read JCA; Wong ZY; Yek X; Wong YX; Bachtoula O; Llamas-Cornejo I; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Nov; 40(6):815-827. PubMed ID: 32989799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.
    Lagstein O; Hecht I; Anteby I
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Mar; 57(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 32203597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.
    Vancleef K; Read JCA; Herbert W; Goodship N; Woodhouse M; Serrano-Pedraza I
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):507-520. PubMed ID: 28337792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ASTEROID: A New Clinical Stereotest on an Autostereo 3D Tablet.
    Vancleef K; Serrano-Pedraza I; Sharp C; Slack G; Black C; Casanova T; Hugill J; Rafiq S; Burridge J; Puyat V; Enongue JE; Gale H; Akotei H; Collier Z; Haggerty H; Smart K; Powell C; Taylor K; Clarke MP; Morgan G; Read JCA
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2019 Jan; 8(1):25. PubMed ID: 30834173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterizing the Randot Preschool stereotest: Testability, norms, reliability, specificity and sensitivity in children aged 2-11 years.
    Read JCA; Rafiq S; Hugill J; Casanova T; Black C; O'Neill A; Puyat V; Haggerty H; Smart K; Powell C; Taylor K; Clarke MP; Vancleef K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224402. PubMed ID: 31697704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test retest variability in stereoacuity measurements.
    Mehta J; O'Connor A
    Strabismus; 2023 Sep; 31(3):188-196. PubMed ID: 37705215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between depth perception by three-rods test and stereoacuity by distance Randot Stereotest.
    Matsuo T; Negayama R; Sakata H; Hasebe K
    Strabismus; 2014 Sep; 22(3):133-7. PubMed ID: 25058604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New stereoacuity test using a 3-dimensional display system in children.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116626. PubMed ID: 25693034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.
    Wang J; Hatt SR; O'Connor AR; Drover JR; Adams R; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2010 Apr; 14(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 20199880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interobserver test-retest reliability of the Randot preschool stereoacuity test.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2000 Dec; 4(6):354-8. PubMed ID: 11124670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real depth vs randot stereotests.
    Leske DA; Birch EE; Holmes JM
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Oct; 142(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17011876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of 3D tablet-based stereoacuity test ASTEROID in children with normal and abnormal visual acuity.
    Wong BM; Fung SSM; Velez FG; Perez C; Guo R; Yu F; Pineles SL
    J AAPOS; 2024 Jun; 28(3):103930. PubMed ID: 38719139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining real change in measures of stereoacuity.
    Adams WE; Leske DA; Hatt SR; Holmes JM
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):281-5. PubMed ID: 19091410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of the agreement between contour-based circles and random dot-based near stereoacuity tests.
    Fawcett SL
    J AAPOS; 2005 Dec; 9(6):572-8. PubMed ID: 16414526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The eRDS v6 Stereotest and the Vivid Vision Stereo Test: Two New Tests of Stereoscopic Vision.
    Denkinger S; Antoniou MP; Tarello D; Levi DM; Backus BT; Bavelier D; Chopin A
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2023 Mar; 12(3):1. PubMed ID: 36857068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testability of preschoolers on stereotests used to screen vision disorders.
    Schmidt PP; Maguire MG; Moore B; Cyert L;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Nov; 80(11):753-7. PubMed ID: 14627942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test: normative data and validity.
    Birch E; Williams C; Drover J; Fu V; Cheng C; Northstone K; Courage M; Adams R
    J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 17720573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity.
    Han SB; Yang HK; Kim J; Hong K; Lee B; Hwang JM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 93(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 26927523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.