123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32879943)
1. Global Sensitivity Analysis for Patient-Specific Aortic Simulations: The Role of Geometry, Boundary Condition and Large Eddy Simulation Modeling Parameters.
Xu H; Baroli D; Veneziani A
J Biomech Eng; 2021 Feb; 143(2):. PubMed ID: 32879943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Numerical Simulations of Thoracic Aorta Hemodynamics: Comparison with In Vivo Measurements and Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis.
Boccadifuoco A; Mariotti A; Capellini K; Celi S; Salvetti MV
Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):688-706. PubMed ID: 30357714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of inlet and outlet boundary conditions in image-based CFD modeling of aortic flow.
Madhavan S; Kemmerling EMC
Biomed Eng Online; 2018 May; 17(1):66. PubMed ID: 29843730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Cardiac Motion on Aortic Valve Flow Used in Computational Simulations of the Thoracic Aorta.
Wendell DC; Samyn MM; Cava JR; Krolikowski MM; LaDisa JF
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Sep; 138(9):0910011-09100111. PubMed ID: 27367143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Uncertainty of Outlet Boundary Conditions in a Patient-Specific Case of Aortic Coarctation.
Antonuccio MN; Mariotti A; Fanni BM; Capellini K; Capelli C; Sauvage E; Celi S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3494-3507. PubMed ID: 34431017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large eddy simulations of blood dynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Vergara C; Le Van D; Quadrio M; Formaggia L; Domanin M
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():38-46. PubMed ID: 28709929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of morphological and hemodynamical indexes in abdominal aortic aneurysms as preliminary indicators of intraluminal thrombus deposition.
Colciago CM; Deparis S; Domanin M; Riccobene C; Schenone E; Quarteroni A
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Jun; 19(3):1035-1053. PubMed ID: 31820279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.
Chandra S; Raut SS; Jana A; Biederman RW; Doyle M; Muluk SC; Finol EA
J Biomech Eng; 2013 Aug; 135(8):81001. PubMed ID: 23719760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Computational Methodologies for Accurate Prediction of Wall Shear Stress and Turbulence Parameters in a Patient-Specific Aorta.
Manchester EL; Pirola S; Salmasi MY; O'Regan DP; Athanasiou T; Xu XY
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2022; 10():836611. PubMed ID: 35402418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A longitudinal comparison of hemodynamics and intraluminal thrombus deposition in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
Arzani A; Suh GY; Dalman RL; Shadden SC
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol; 2014 Dec; 307(12):H1786-95. PubMed ID: 25326533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification and propagation in cardiovascular simulations.
Sankaran S; Marsden AL
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031001. PubMed ID: 21303177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A parametric model for studying the aorta hemodynamics by means of the computational fluid dynamics.
Cilla M; Casales M; Peña E; Martínez MA; Malvè M
J Biomech; 2020 Apr; 103():109691. PubMed ID: 32147240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Bayesian approach to blood rheological uncertainties in aortic hemodynamics.
Ranftl S; Müller TS; Windberger U; Brenn G; von der Linden W
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2023 Apr; 39(4):e3576. PubMed ID: 35099851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Choice of in vivo versus idealized velocity boundary conditions influences physiologically relevant flow patterns in a subject-specific simulation of flow in the human carotid bifurcation.
Wake AK; Oshinski JN; Tannenbaum AR; Giddens DP
J Biomech Eng; 2009 Feb; 131(2):021013. PubMed ID: 19102572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A computational fluid dynamics study on geometrical influence of the aorta on haemodynamics.
Tse KM; Chang R; Lee HP; Lim SP; Venkatesh SK; Ho P
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 43(4):829-38. PubMed ID: 22766960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A reduced-order model for wall shear stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms by proper orthogonal decomposition.
Chang GH; Schirmer CM; Modarres-Sadeghi Y
J Biomech; 2017 Mar; 54():33-43. PubMed ID: 28238422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of inlet waveforms on computational hemodynamics of patient-specific intracranial aneurysms.
Xiang J; Siddiqui AH; Meng H
J Biomech; 2014 Dec; 47(16):3882-90. PubMed ID: 25446264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 2D FSI determination of mechanical stresses on aneurismal walls.
Veshkina N; Zbicinski I; Stefańczyk L
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2519-26. PubMed ID: 25226953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A computational study on the influence of aortic valve disease on hemodynamics in dilated aorta.
Xu LJ; Yin LK; Liu YJ; Liang FY
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 Oct; 17(1):606-626. PubMed ID: 31731367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of an Adaptive Polynomial Chaos Expansion on Computationally Expensive Three-Dimensional Cardiovascular Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis.
Quicken S; Donders WP; van Disseldorp EM; Gashi K; Mees BM; van de Vosse FN; Lopata RG; Delhaas T; Huberts W
J Biomech Eng; 2016 Dec; 138(12):. PubMed ID: 27636531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
