310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32880466)
1. The impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with lymph node metastasis of unknown primary origin.
Nikolova PN; Hadzhiyska VH; Mladenov KB; Ilcheva MG; Veneva S; Grudeva VV; Dineva SE; Asenov YN
Neoplasma; 2021 Jan; 68(1):180-189. PubMed ID: 32880466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of 18-F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomographic/Computed Tomographic Imaging in Primary Staging of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity.
Linz C; Brands RC; Herterich T; Hartmann S; Müller-Richter U; Kübler AC; Haug L; Kertels O; Bley TA; Dierks A; Buck AK; Lapa C; Brumberg J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e217083. PubMed ID: 33881529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic performance of
Ishiguchi H; Ito S; Kato K; Sakurai Y; Kawai H; Fujita N; Abe S; Narita A; Nishio N; Muramatsu H; Takahashi Y; Naganawa S
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):348-362. PubMed ID: 29667143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and
Noij DP; Martens RM; Zwezerijnen B; Koopman T; de Bree R; Hoekstra OS; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():20-25. PubMed ID: 30292267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The role of PET-CT in detecting unknown primary tumour in patients with cervical lymph node metastases].
Fülöp M; Kásler M; Remenár E; Lengyel Z; Borbély K
Magy Onkol; 2012 May; 56(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 22629545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The diagnostic accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography and sentinel node biopsy in the prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(38):e12522. PubMed ID: 30235772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Which is better for predicting pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer: Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography or a sentinel node biopsy? A retrospective observational study.
Tanaka T; Sasaki S; Tsuchihashi H; Terai Y; Yamamoto K; Yamada T; Ohmichi M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Apr; 97(16):e0410. PubMed ID: 29668599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative
Goense L; Meziani J; van Rossum PSN; Wessels FJ; Lam MGEH; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):2031-2037. PubMed ID: 29218619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combination of FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced MSCT in detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer.
Tan R; Yao SZ; Huang ZQ; Li J; Li X; Tan HH; Liu QW
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(18):7719-24. PubMed ID: 25292052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR replace sentinel lymph node resection in malignant melanoma?
Schaarschmidt BM; Grueneisen J; Stebner V; Klode J; Stoffels I; Umutlu L; Schadendorf D; Heusch P; Antoch G; Pöppel TD
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2093-2102. PubMed ID: 29876618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lack of clinical impact of
Liu J; Larcos G; Howle J; Veness M
Australas J Dermatol; 2017 May; 58(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 26459330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Significance of dual-time-point 18F-FDG PET imaging in evaluation of hilar and mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer].
Hu M; Yu JM; Liu NB; Liu LP; Guo HB; Yang GR; Zhang PL; Xu XQ
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2008 Apr; 30(4):306-9. PubMed ID: 18788639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kim SJ; Pak K; Kim K
Am J Otolaryngol; 2019; 40(2):297-305. PubMed ID: 30473166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung squamous-cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma.
Lu P; Sun Y; Sun Y; Yu L
Lung Cancer; 2014 Jul; 85(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 24792334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of unknown primary tumours and distant metastases in patients with cervical metastases: value of FDG-PET versus conventional modalities.
Regelink G; Brouwer J; de Bree R; Pruim J; van der Laan BF; Vaalburg W; Hoekstra OS; Comans EF; Vissink A; Leemans CR; Roodenburg JL
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1024-30. PubMed ID: 12173016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Cheol Park G; Roh JL; Cho KJ; Seung Kim J; Hyeon Jin M; Choi SH; Yuhl Nam S; Yoon Kim S
Int J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 140(6):1405-1412. PubMed ID: 27943271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the diagnostic value of 3-deoxy-3-18F-fluorothymidine and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of regional lymph node in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.
Han D; Yu J; Zhong X; Fu Z; Mu D; Zhang B; Xu G; Yang W; Zhao S
Dis Esophagus; 2012 Jul; 25(5):416-26. PubMed ID: 21951837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DaPeCa-7: comparative assessment of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and conventional diagnostic CT in diagnosis of lymph node metastases, distant metastases and incidental findings in patients with invasive penile cancer.
Jakobsen JK; Frahm Nielsen T; Ipsen P; Albrecht-Beste E; Cardoso Costa J; Alslev L; Predbjørn Krarup K; Grønkaer Toft B; Høyer S; Bouchelouche K; Bjerggaard Jensen J
BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 33448605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective comparison of 18F-FDG PET with conventional imaging modalities (CT, MRI, US) in lymph node staging of head and neck cancer.
Adams S; Baum RP; Stuckensen T; Bitter K; Hör G
Eur J Nucl Med; 1998 Sep; 25(9):1255-60. PubMed ID: 9724374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of 3T multiparametric MRI and FDG-PET-CT in the evaluation of occult primary cancer with cervical node metastasis.
Gődény M; Lengyel Z; Polony G; Nagy ZT; Léránt G; Zámbó O; Remenár É; Tamás L; Kásler M
Cancer Imaging; 2016 Nov; 16(1):38. PubMed ID: 27814768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
