201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32880752)
1. Role of minimally invasive surgery versus open approach in patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas: a retrospective multicentric study.
Corrado G; Ciccarone F; Cosentino F; Legge F; Rosati A; Arcieri M; Turco LC; Certelli C; Federico A; Vizza E; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Mar; 147(3):845-852. PubMed ID: 32880752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adoption of minimally invasive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with metastatic uterine cancer.
Zhou ZN; Chen L; Melamed A; St Clair CM; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; Gockley A; Hershman DL; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 164(2):341-347. PubMed ID: 34920885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of minimally invasive versus open surgery in the treatment of endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Pedra Nobre S; Mueller JJ; Gardner GJ; Long Roche K; Brown CL; Soslow RA; Alektiar KM; Sonoda Y; Broach VA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Chi DS; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1162-1168. PubMed ID: 32690592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is minimally invasive surgery for clinical stage I uterine carcinosarcoma safe?
Sinha R; Nizam A; Shan W; Shih KK; Frimer M; Sakaris A; Goldberg GL
J Robot Surg; 2022 Aug; 16(4):943-949. PubMed ID: 34716874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group.
Harano K; Hirakawa A; Yunokawa M; Nakamura T; Satoh T; Nishikawa T; Aoki D; Ito K; Ito K; Nakanishi T; Susumu N; Takehara K; Watanabe Y; Watari H; Saito T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2016 Feb; 21(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 26084780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?
Benoit L; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Balaya V; Nos C; Montero-Macías R; Bats AS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):231-239. PubMed ID: 32964259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early-stage carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the significance of lymph node count.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2007; 17(1):215-9. PubMed ID: 17291256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive secondary cytoreduction plus HIPEC versus open surgery plus HIPEC in isolated relapse from ovarian cancer: a retrospective cohort study on perioperative outcomes.
Fagotti A; Costantini B; Gallotta V; Cianci S; Ronsini C; Petrillo M; Pacciani M; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):428-32. PubMed ID: 25461683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical significance of radiotherapy in patients with primary uterine carcinosarcoma: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-08).
Cha J; Kim YS; Park W; Kim HJ; Kim JY; Kim JH; Kim J; Yoon WS; Kim JW; Kim YB
J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Nov; 27(6):e58. PubMed ID: 27550404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment outcomes in completely resected stage I to stage IV uterine carcinosarcoma with rhabdomyosarcoma differentiation.
Makker V; Kravetz SJ; Gallagher J; Orodel OP; Zhou Q; Iasonos A; DeLair D; Aghajanian C; Hensley ML
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1635-41. PubMed ID: 24172099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uterine adenosarcoma with sarcomatous overgrowth versus uterine carcinosarcoma: comparison of treatment and survival.
Krivak TC; Seidman JD; McBroom JW; MacKoul PJ; Aye LM; Rose GS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Oct; 83(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 11585418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review.
Scaletta G; Dinoi G; Capozzi V; Cianci S; Pelligra S; Ergasti R; Fagotti A; Scambia G; Fanfani F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 46(5):782-788. PubMed ID: 31818527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
